Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Florida
Brookdale Winter Haven-MC
WINTER HAVEN, FL · ~27 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 3.0
- Avg TCR
- 3.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Brookdale Winter Haven-MC runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate — safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace — earning a grade B.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 3.0
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.8
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 4
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Brookdale Winter Haven-MC's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 6 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024).
Injury rate over time
Brookdale Winter Haven-MC's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.8 industry benchmark.
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 623312.
Brookdale Winter Haven-MC has an average TCR of 3.0, which is 78% of the industry average (3.8) for Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities. This is better than average.
Safety Insights for Brookdale Winter Haven-MC
Brookdale Winter Haven-MC operates an establishment with approximately 27 full-time equivalent workers in WINTER HAVEN, FL, classified under the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities industry (NAICS 623312). Across 6 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 4 recordable injuries, 0 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.0 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the B letter grade (Good Safety Record).
Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 3.8 for Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities, Brookdale Winter Haven-MC's workforce experiences 78% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked — a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers — so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR below the benchmark signals that controls, training, or automation may be outperforming peers.
Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 6 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating Brookdale Winter Haven-MC as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries — there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Brookdale Winter Haven-MC's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source — name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor — OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 623312 — Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities.
DART Rate — Transparent Calculation (2024)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 34,431 hours worked = 0.00 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904 — OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context — Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Brookdale Winter Haven-MC (this establishment) | 2.95 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 6-year avg |
| Homes for the elderly without nursing care industry avg | 3.80 | BLS IIF, NAICS 623312 |
| Florida state avg (all industries) | 4.57 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics — Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Brookdale Winter Haven-MC to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2021: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) — inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Brookdale Winter Haven-MC's safety grade?
How is the safety grade calculated?
How many injuries has Brookdale Winter Haven-MC reported?
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.