Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona
Mountain Vista Senior Living
TUCSON, AZ · ~81 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 2.9
- Avg TCR
- 3.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Mountain Vista Senior Living runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate — safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace — earning a grade B.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 2.9
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.8
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 7
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Mountain Vista Senior Living's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 4 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024).
Injury rate over time
Mountain Vista Senior Living's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.8 industry benchmark.
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 623312.
Mountain Vista Senior Living has an average TCR of 2.9, which is 76% of the industry average (3.8) for Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities. This is better than average.
Safety Insights for Mountain Vista Senior Living
Mountain Vista Senior Living operates an establishment with approximately 81 full-time equivalent workers in TUCSON, AZ, classified under the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities industry (NAICS 623312). Across 4 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 7 recordable injuries, 0 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the B letter grade (Good Safety Record).
Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 3.8 for Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities, Mountain Vista Senior Living's workforce experiences 76% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked — a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers — so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR below the benchmark signals that controls, training, or automation may be outperforming peers.
Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 4 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating Mountain Vista Senior Living as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries — there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Mountain Vista Senior Living's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source — name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor — OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 623312 — Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities.
DART Rate — Transparent Calculation (2020)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 114,189 hours worked = 0.00 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904 — OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context — Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Mountain Vista Senior Living (this establishment) | 2.90 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 4-year avg |
| Homes for the elderly without nursing care industry avg | 3.80 | BLS IIF, NAICS 623312 |
| Arizona state avg (all industries) | 4.73 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics — Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Mountain Vista Senior Living to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2020: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 3 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) — inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Mountain Vista Senior Living's safety grade?
How is the safety grade calculated?
How many injuries has Mountain Vista Senior Living reported?
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.