Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Ohio
Royalton WoodsA Randall Residence
NORTH ROYALTON, OH · ~56 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- C
- Average Safety Record
- 3.5
- Avg TCR
- 3.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Royalton WoodsA Randall Residence runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate — about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace — earning a grade C.
- C
- Average Safety Record
- 3.5
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.8
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 2
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Royalton WoodsA Randall Residence's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 5 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024).
Injury rate over time
Royalton WoodsA Randall Residence's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.8 industry benchmark.
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 623312.
Royalton WoodsA Randall Residence has an average TCR of 3.5, which is 93% of the industry average (3.8) for Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities. This is better than average.
Safety Insights for Royalton WoodsA Randall Residence
Royalton WoodsA Randall Residence operates an establishment with approximately 56 full-time equivalent workers in NORTH ROYALTON, OH, classified under the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities industry (NAICS 623312). Across 5 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 2 recordable injuries, 8 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.5 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the C letter grade (Average Safety Record).
Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 3.8 for Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities, Royalton WoodsA Randall Residence's workforce experiences 93% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked — a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers — so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR below the benchmark signals that controls, training, or automation may be outperforming peers.
Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 5 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating Royalton WoodsA Randall Residence as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries — there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Royalton WoodsA Randall Residence's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source — name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor — OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 623312 — Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities.
DART Rate — Transparent Calculation (2021)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
2 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 98,000 hours worked = 4.08 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904 — OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context — Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Royalton WoodsA Randall Residence (this establishment) | 3.54 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 5-year avg |
| Homes for the elderly without nursing care industry avg | 3.80 | BLS IIF, NAICS 623312 |
| Ohio state avg (all industries) | 3.90 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics — Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Royalton WoodsA Randall Residence to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2021: 3 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 2 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2020: 6 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 6 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) — inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 6.1 | 4.1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| 2020 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 3.1 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Royalton WoodsA Randall Residence's safety grade?
How is the safety grade calculated?
How many injuries has Royalton WoodsA Randall Residence reported?
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.