Hospitality and Leisure · California

000009002 - Yosemite - Yosemite Valley Lodge

Yosemite National Park, CA · ~300 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.2
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

000009002 - Yosemite - Yosemite Valley Lodge runs at 373% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hospitality and Leisure workplace, earning a grade F.

000009002 - Yosemite - Yosemite Valley Lodge: 11.2 TCR = 373% of Hospitality and Leisure BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

000009002 - Yosemite - Yosemite Valley Lodge safety composite

000009002 - Yosemite - Yosemite Valley Lodge scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2017

000009002 - Yosemite - Yosemite Valley Lodge injury rate improved

000009002 - Yosemite - Yosemite Valley Lodge's TCR fell 2.3 from 12.3 in 2016 to 10.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.3 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.3 · 2017=10.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Yosemite National Park, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.2 · 373% of ind

  • DART 10.0 DART
  • RANK #917/1298
  • PHOTO The Atherton Hotel
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~300 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Atherton Hotel (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

000009002 - Yosemite - Yosemite Valley Lodge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 000009002 - Yosemite - Yosemite Valley Lodge averages 11.2 TCR (373% of the Hospitality and Leisure BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

000009002 - Yosemite - Yosemite Valley Lodge TCR series: 2016=12.3 · 2017=10 · BLS 3.0

Where 000009002 - Yosemite - Yosemite Valley Lodge falls in its industry

9,342 Hospitality and Leisure establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #917 safest of 1298 Hospitality and Leisure employers in California.

000009002 - Yosemite - Yosemite Valley Lodge (300 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 000009002 - Yosemite - Yosemite Valley Lodge
000009002 - Yosemite - Yosemite Valley Lodge (300 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

000009002 - Yosemite - Yosemite Valley Lodge has more employees than the Hospitality and Leisure median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 10.0 10.0 18 0 0
2016 12.3 11.1 17 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · CA · Yosemite National Park

9,342 Hospitality and Leisure employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 3 employers in Yosemite National Park, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Atherton Hotel 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flamingo Bay 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bilwin Development Affiliates LLC dba SpringHill Suites Tuckahoe 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Big Sky Resort 11.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fairbanks Ranch 300 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCF4 Solutions 300 FTE
STATE-SIZE LADWP 14401 SATICOY 300 FTE
STATE-SIZE OAKLAND SERVICE CENTER 300 FTE
CITY-NEAR 000008998 - YOSEMITE - MAJESTIC YOSEMITE HOTEL 338 FTE
CITY-NEAR 000009004 - YOSEMITE - HALF DOME VILLAGE 264 FTE
NAT-TCR Tiffin Univ Wall Street Pub & Grille (Findlay 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Southern Regional School Dist 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Arc Broward - BARC 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Beck Steel Inc. 11.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE CORA Services Fox Chase 300 FTE
NAT-SIZE Outerloop Building 5 (Kylse) 300 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kate Spade Corporate NJ 300 FTE
NAT-SIZE Certech: Wood-Ridge, NJ 300 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.