Other Airport Operations · South Carolina

00001316 Chs - 316 Charleston Intl Airport

North Charleston, SC · ~22 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

00001316 Chs - 316 Charleston Intl Airport runs at 111% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Other Airport Operations workplace, earning a grade C.

00001316 Chs - 316 Charleston Intl Airport: 5.0 TCR = 111% of Other Airport Operations BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

00001316 Chs - 316 Charleston Intl Airport safety composite

00001316 Chs - 316 Charleston Intl Airport scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

00001316 Chs - 316 Charleston Intl Airport: 4.8 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

00001316 Chs - 316 Charleston Intl Airport's TCR rose 0.4 from 4.8 in 2023 to 5.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · North Charleston, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.0 · 111% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/20
  • PHOTO Sheltair Aviation JAX
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sheltair Aviation JAX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

00001316 Chs - 316 Charleston Intl Airport in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 00001316 Chs - 316 Charleston Intl Airport averages 5.0 TCR (111% of the Other Airport Operations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

00001316 Chs - 316 Charleston Intl Airport TCR series: 2023=4.8 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 4.5

Where 00001316 Chs - 316 Charleston Intl Airport falls in its industry

1,555 Other Airport Operations establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 20 Other Airport Operations employers in South Carolina.

00001316 Chs - 316 Charleston Intl Airport (22 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate 00001316 Chs - 316 Charleston Intl Airport
00001316 Chs - 316 Charleston Intl Airport (22 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

00001316 Chs - 316 Charleston Intl Airport has fewer employees than the Other Airport Operations median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 0.0 1 0 0
2023 4.8 4.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · SC · North Charleston

1,555 Other Airport Operations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 256 employers in North Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sheltair Aviation JAX 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00001250 MKE-250 MILWAUKEE MITCHELL INT L AIRPORT 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DGS Aviation Services : IAH - Houston 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FATCX0UPS FAT - UPS 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE ISE Newberry Liquid Plant 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Summerville SC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allendale Biomass LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenville Business Office 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charleston County 2,601 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Goodwill Services 1,105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trident Medical Center 1,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR SRC Charleston ISS Division 815 FTE
NAT-TCR Pacific Tomato Growers, Ltd/PTG Management Co. - Palmetto Location 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Franke Foodservice Systems Americas - Fayetteville 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Marin General Hospital Corp 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Oakland Nursery - Columbus 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Judson University 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Naumes, Inc. Corporate Office 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dfa Distributing North - Erie 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zaclon LLC 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.