Other Airport Operations · Virginia

00001348 Cho - 348 Charlottesville-Albemarle Apt

Charlottesville, VA · ~26 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

00001348 Cho - 348 Charlottesville-Albemarle Apt runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Other Airport Operations workplace, earning a grade A.

00001348 Cho - 348 Charlottesville-Albemarle Apt: 1.9 TCR = 43% of Other Airport Operations BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

00001348 Cho - 348 Charlottesville-Albemarle Apt safety composite

00001348 Cho - 348 Charlottesville-Albemarle Apt scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

00001348 Cho - 348 Charlottesville-Albemarle Apt: 0.0 → 3.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.99× in 2024

00001348 Cho - 348 Charlottesville-Albemarle Apt's TCR rose 3.8 from 0.0 in 2023 to 3.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Charlottesville, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 43% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #12/48
  • PHOTO 00001284 FLL - 284 F…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 00001284 FLL - 284 FT. LAUDERDAL-HOLLYWOOD INTL A (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

00001348 Cho - 348 Charlottesville-Albemarle Apt in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 00001348 Cho - 348 Charlottesville-Albemarle Apt averages 1.9 TCR (43% of the Other Airport Operations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

00001348 Cho - 348 Charlottesville-Albemarle Apt TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=3.8 · BLS 4.5

Where 00001348 Cho - 348 Charlottesville-Albemarle Apt falls in its industry

1,555 Other Airport Operations establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 48 Other Airport Operations employers in Virginia.

00001348 Cho - 348 Charlottesville-Albemarle Apt (26 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate 00001348 Cho - 348 Charlottesville-Albemarle Apt
00001348 Cho - 348 Charlottesville-Albemarle Apt (26 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

00001348 Cho - 348 Charlottesville-Albemarle Apt has fewer employees than the Other Airport Operations median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · VA · Charlottesville

1,555 Other Airport Operations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 269 employers in Charlottesville, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 00001284 FLL - 284 FT. LAUDERDAL-HOLLYWOOD INTL A 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TREGO/DUGAN AVIATION, INC SWF 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unifi Aviation Services : OGG - Kahului 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avports LLC 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Halifax County Biomass 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodlawn Svc Ctr 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Craig-Botetourt Electric Co-op 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Washington Gas Energy Systems - HQ 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Virginia 11,898 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Of Virginia (209) Health System 10,653 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Virginia Medical Center 8,738 FTE
CITY-NEAR UVA Medical Center 7,268 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Lhp Portneuf Food 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dedham Hilton 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mathews Associates Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Manhattan NE 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Trinity Prep School Fac Mgt 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Scotts Company - Palmdale 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bbs - Schenectady Truss 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Karl's Truck Repair 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.