Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · Hawaii

0120 - Hawaii Kai Hi Whse

Honolulu, HI · ~298 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0120 - Hawaii Kai Hi Whse runs at 202% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade F.

0120 - Hawaii Kai Hi Whse: 6.9 TCR = 202% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0120 - Hawaii Kai Hi Whse safety composite

0120 - Hawaii Kai Hi Whse scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2016→2022

0120 - Hawaii Kai Hi Whse injury rate improved

0120 - Hawaii Kai Hi Whse's TCR fell 4.2 from 8.2 in 2016 to 4.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.2 · 2017=8.5 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Honolulu, HI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 202% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO 701-00691
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 108 inj
  • SIZE ~298 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 701-00691 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Hawaii employers → · Look up another →

0120 - Hawaii Kai Hi Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0120 - Hawaii Kai Hi Whse averages 6.9 TCR (202% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0120 - Hawaii Kai Hi Whse TCR series: 2016=8.2 · 2017=8.5 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=4.1 · BLS 3.4

Where 0120 - Hawaii Kai Hi Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Hawaii alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in Hawaii.

0120 - Hawaii Kai Hi Whse (298 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 0120 - Hawaii Kai Hi Whse
0120 - Hawaii Kai Hi Whse (298 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0120 - Hawaii Kai Hi Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.1 2.7 9 0 0
2021 7.5 5.7 17 0 0
2020 7.3 4.7 17 0 0
2019 5.9 5.4 13 0 0
2018 6.8 5.8 15 0 0
2017 8.5 8.5 19 0 0
2016 8.2 8.2 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · HI · Honolulu

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,022 rated employers in Hawaii with headcount on file · 796 employers in Honolulu, HI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 701-00691 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2532-25320180 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2532-25320372 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1049 - ROCKWALL TX WHSE 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Partners in Development Foundation 297 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kohanaiki Club 296 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2314 295 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waikoloa Beach Marriott 302 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9095-HNL 5,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR HNL HONOLULUL 4,589 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hawaiian Airlines - HNL 4,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR 12812007 MOANALUA MEDICAL OFFICES 2,355 FTE
NAT-TCR Pearl Crossing 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR TMS Cartersville 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond East Mentor 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Google Gpak Catering 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tantasqua Regional School District 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0447 - Santa Clarita Ca Whse 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wegmans Chapel Hill 140 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0357 - East Jacksonville Fl Whse 298 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.