Dry bulk trucking (except garbage collection, garbage hauling), local · Pennsylvania

025 Easton/Bethleham PA

Bethlehem, PA · ~33 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

025 Easton/Bethleham PA runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Dry bulk trucking (except garbage collection, garbage hauling), local workplace, earning a grade C.

025 Easton/Bethleham PA: 5.3 TCR = 118% of Dry bulk trucking (except garbage collection, garbage hauling), local BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

025 Easton/Bethleham PA safety composite

025 Easton/Bethleham PA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

025 Easton/Bethleham PA: 0.0 → 10.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 13.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.46× in 2022

025 Easton/Bethleham PA's TCR rose 10.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 10.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Bethlehem, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.3 · 118% of ind

  • DART 7.8 DART
  • RANK #44/61
  • PHOTO Seven Point Energy S…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Seven Point Energy Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

025 Easton/Bethleham PA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 025 Easton/Bethleham PA averages 5.3 TCR (118% of the Dry bulk trucking (except garbage collection, garbage hauling), local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

025 Easton/Bethleham PA TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=13 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=8.8 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=10.4 · BLS 4.5

Where 025 Easton/Bethleham PA falls in its industry

1,130 Dry bulk trucking (except garb establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 61 Dry bulk trucking (except garb employers in Pennsylvania.

025 Easton/Bethleham PA (33 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 025 Easton/Bethleham PA
025 Easton/Bethleham PA (33 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

025 Easton/Bethleham PA has fewer employees than the Dry bulk trucking (except garbage collec median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 10.4 7.8 4 0 0
2021 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 8.8 4.4 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2017 13.0 10.4 5 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · PA · Bethlehem

1,130 Dry bulk trucking (except garbage collection, garbage hauling), local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 358 employers in Bethlehem, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Seven Point Energy Services, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunoco Transportation Aloha 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunburst Transportation, LLC 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR KAG West 52055 Seattle 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Caputo & Guest 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colver Power Project 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oil City 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Norristown Operations 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Hospital 5,338 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Physician's Group 3,041 FTE
CITY-NEAR LVH-Muhlenberg 2,139 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4087 2,105 FTE
NAT-TCR MercyOne North Iowa Medical Center 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 4598-Rtl Chicago Idealease 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro East TMC (Conyers)- 1465 General Arts Rd. Conyers, GA 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR MFE103 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pennsauken Branch 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2019137 - Operations Bldg 1 & Central Utility Plant 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Conflo Services, Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crossroads IGA #781 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.