Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · Michigan

0374 - Lakeside Mi Whse

Shelby Township, MI · ~306 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0374 - Lakeside Mi Whse runs at 226% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade F.

0374 - Lakeside Mi Whse: 7.7 TCR = 226% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0374 - Lakeside Mi Whse safety composite

0374 - Lakeside Mi Whse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

0374 - Lakeside Mi Whse: 7.8 → 8.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 10.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.98× in 2022

0374 - Lakeside Mi Whse's TCR rose 0.5 from 7.8 in 2016 to 8.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Shelby Township, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 226% of ind

  • DART 7.5 DART
  • RANK #138/141
  • PHOTO 25320173 WALLINGFORD…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 116 inj
  • SIZE ~306 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 25320173 WALLINGFORD, CT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

0374 - Lakeside Mi Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0374 - Lakeside Mi Whse averages 7.7 TCR (226% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0374 - Lakeside Mi Whse TCR series: 2016=7.8 · 2017=10.3 · 2018=10.9 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=5.4 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=8.3 · BLS 3.4

Where 0374 - Lakeside Mi Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #138 safest of 141 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in Michigan.

0374 - Lakeside Mi Whse (306 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 0374 - Lakeside Mi Whse
0374 - Lakeside Mi Whse (306 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0374 - Lakeside Mi Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.3 7.5 20 0 0
2021 5.7 5.7 13 0 0
2020 5.4 5.4 12 0 0
2019 5.6 5.6 12 0 0
2018 10.9 10.9 22 1 0
2017 10.3 9.8 21 0 0
2016 7.8 7.8 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · MI · Shelby Township

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 86 employers in Shelby Township, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 25320173 WALLINGFORD, CT 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 701-00024 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2532-25320173 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0439 - AURORA CO WHSE 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Unified Brands 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE AANA - Auburn Hills 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE MAHLE Engine Components USA, Inc. - St. Johns 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shiloh Industries - Galesburg 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DET2 804 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dan's Excavating, Inc. 468 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant 4 349 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayco Shelby 320 FTE
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond La Quinta 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Rha Builders, Inc. 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Triton Trailers 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Gilley Wood, Inc 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0241 - New Rochelle Ny Whse 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0126 - Garden Grove Ca Whse 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZERC 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kaman Integrated Structures and Metallics 306 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.