Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · California

0482 - Richmond Ca Whse

Richmond, CA · ~449 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0482 - Richmond Ca Whse runs at 208% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade F.

0482 - Richmond Ca Whse: 7.1 TCR = 208% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0482 - Richmond Ca Whse safety composite

0482 - Richmond Ca Whse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2022

0482 - Richmond Ca Whse injury rate improved

0482 - Richmond Ca Whse's TCR fell 0.5 from 6.7 in 2017 to 6.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.7 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=9.5 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Richmond, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 208% of ind

  • DART 5.9 DART
  • RANK #131/156
  • PHOTO 0687 - IWILEI HI WHSE
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 138 inj
  • SIZE ~449 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 0687 - IWILEI HI WHSE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

0482 - Richmond Ca Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0482 - Richmond Ca Whse averages 7.1 TCR (208% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0482 - Richmond Ca Whse TCR series: 2017=6.7 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=9.5 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=6.2 · BLS 3.4

Where 0482 - Richmond Ca Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #131 safest of 156 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in California.

0482 - Richmond Ca Whse (449 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 0482 - Richmond Ca Whse
0482 - Richmond Ca Whse (449 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0482 - Richmond Ca Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.2 5.9 21 0 0
2021 6.1 6.1 20 0 0
2020 6.6 5.1 22 0 0
2019 9.5 7.7 31 0 0
2018 7.3 6.4 23 1 0
2017 6.7 6.4 21 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · CA · Richmond

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Richmond, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 0687 - IWILEI HI WHSE 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0316 - STATEN ISLAND NY WHSE 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1074 - METTAWA IL WHSE 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0067 - MISSOULA MT WHSE 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE CA-Alhambra Combined: SCE 10 449 FTE
STATE-SIZE Total-Western, Inc. 449 FTE
STATE-SIZE C.R. Laurence Co., Inc - SC01 Vernon 449 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coral Production 449 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 134 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 635 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 147 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 105 2,724 FTE
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Flowood 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Marriott Palms Resorts Royal, Imperial, Sabal 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lynwood-Hadady Corporation 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Friendship Retirement Community 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wegmans Warrington 036 449 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Paper Pine Hill Mill 449 FTE
NAT-SIZE DPT - East Josephine Street 449 FTE
NAT-SIZE 398350-Tulsa Ok P&Dc 449 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.