Mail and Parcel Delivery · California

056464-Ric-Mcvittie Anx

Richmond, CA · ~73 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

056464-Ric-Mcvittie Anx runs at 379% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mail and Parcel Delivery workplace, earning a grade F.

056464-Ric-Mcvittie Anx: 17.0 TCR = 379% of Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

056464-Ric-Mcvittie Anx safety composite

056464-Ric-Mcvittie Anx scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.5

2017→2022

056464-Ric-Mcvittie Anx injury rate improved

056464-Ric-Mcvittie Anx's TCR fell 6.5 from 15.2 in 2017 to 8.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 24.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.2 · 2018=13.9 · 2019=18.6 · 2020=21.0 · 2021=24.8 · 2022=8.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Richmond, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.0 · 379% of ind

  • DART 8.7 DART
  • RANK #1202/1240
  • PHOTO 230422-BAL-PARKVILLE…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 64 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 230422-BAL-PARKVILLE BR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

056464-Ric-Mcvittie Anx in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 056464-Ric-Mcvittie Anx averages 17.0 TCR (379% of the Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

056464-Ric-Mcvittie Anx TCR series: 2017=15.2 · 2018=13.9 · 2019=18.6 · 2020=21 · 2021=24.8 · 2022=8.7 · BLS 4.5

Where 056464-Ric-Mcvittie Anx falls in its industry

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1202 safest of 1240 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers in California.

056464-Ric-Mcvittie Anx (73 employees, TCR 17.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 056464-Ric-Mcvittie Anx
056464-Ric-Mcvittie Anx (73 employees, TCR 17.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

056464-Ric-Mcvittie Anx has more employees than the Mail and Parcel Delivery median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.7 8.7 6 0 0
2021 24.8 23.3 15 2 0
2020 21.0 21.0 12 2 0
2019 18.6 18.6 12 1 0
2018 13.9 13.9 9 1 0
2017 15.2 15.2 10 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · CA · Richmond

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Richmond, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 230422-BAL-PARKVILLE BR 17.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 256180-MIDLAND PO 17.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 161501-CHI-ASHBURN STA 17.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 284243-KCM-WALDO STA 17.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Columbia 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Location 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE P-R Farms Inc/Palomate Inc 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 134 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 635 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 147 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 105 2,724 FTE
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-01556 17.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri State Curb, Inc. 17.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Albany #143 17.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Albuquerque Equipment & Roofing Supplies, Inc. 17.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 142408-Hnl-Waialae-Kahala Sta 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE 548248-Sum-Main Office Sta 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE 340127-Abq-Main Office Sta 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE 038436-Tempe Po 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.