Mail and Parcel Delivery · California

056465-Ric-Hilltop Carrier Anx

Richmond, CA · ~85 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

056465-Ric-Hilltop Carrier Anx runs at 188% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Mail and Parcel Delivery workplace, earning a grade D.

056465-Ric-Hilltop Carrier Anx: 8.5 TCR = 188% of Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

056465-Ric-Hilltop Carrier Anx safety composite

056465-Ric-Hilltop Carrier Anx scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
B 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.1

2017→2022

056465-Ric-Hilltop Carrier Anx injury rate improved

056465-Ric-Hilltop Carrier Anx's TCR fell 8.1 from 10.8 in 2017 to 2.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 15.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.8 · 2018=15.2 · 2019=3.9 · 2021=9.8 · 2022=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Richmond, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.5 · 188% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #848/1240
  • PHOTO UNCASVILLE_1385347
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UNCASVILLE_1385347 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

056465-Ric-Hilltop Carrier Anx in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 056465-Ric-Hilltop Carrier Anx averages 8.5 TCR (188% of the Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

056465-Ric-Hilltop Carrier Anx TCR series: 2017=10.8 · 2018=15.2 · 2019=3.9 · 2021=9.8 · 2022=2.7 · BLS 4.5

Where 056465-Ric-Hilltop Carrier Anx falls in its industry

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #848 safest of 1240 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers in California.

056465-Ric-Hilltop Carrier Anx (85 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 056465-Ric-Hilltop Carrier Anx
056465-Ric-Hilltop Carrier Anx (85 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

056465-Ric-Hilltop Carrier Anx has more employees than the Mail and Parcel Delivery median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2021 9.8 8.5 8 0 0
2019 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2018 15.2 15.2 12 1 0
2017 10.8 10.8 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · CA · Richmond

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Richmond, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UNCASVILLE_1385347 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 335250-MILLVILLE PO 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 350185-NEW YORK INTL SVC CTR 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 356750-PORT JERVIS PO 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gallo Vineyards, Inc. 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roche Brothers Inc. 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Village Nurseries Pauma Valley Yard 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunlet Nursery, Inc. 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 134 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 635 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 147 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 105 2,724 FTE
NAT-TCR 547609-Sea-Des Moines Sta 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 259910-Williamston Po 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 512418-Danville Po 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 356750-Port Jervis Po 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 547637-Sea-Riverton Heights Sta 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE 571673-Cheyenne P&Dc 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE 481565-Cedar Park Po 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE 483890-Harlingen Po 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.