Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · Washington

0624 - Gig Harbor Wa Whse

Gig Harbor, WA · ~293 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0624 - Gig Harbor Wa Whse runs at 262% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade F.

0624 - Gig Harbor Wa Whse: 8.9 TCR = 262% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0624 - Gig Harbor Wa Whse safety composite

0624 - Gig Harbor Wa Whse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2022

0624 - Gig Harbor Wa Whse injury rate improved

0624 - Gig Harbor Wa Whse's TCR fell 1.1 from 7.2 in 2017 to 6.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.2 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=10.3 · 2020=11.4 · 2021=9.3 · 2022=6.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Gig Harbor, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.9 · 262% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #108/120
  • PHOTO 0640 - KAUAI HI WHSE
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 115 inj
  • SIZE ~293 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 0640 - KAUAI HI WHSE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

0624 - Gig Harbor Wa Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0624 - Gig Harbor Wa Whse averages 8.9 TCR (262% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0624 - Gig Harbor Wa Whse TCR series: 2017=7.2 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=10.3 · 2020=11.4 · 2021=9.3 · 2022=6.1 · BLS 3.4

Where 0624 - Gig Harbor Wa Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #108 safest of 120 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in Washington.

0624 - Gig Harbor Wa Whse (293 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 0624 - Gig Harbor Wa Whse
0624 - Gig Harbor Wa Whse (293 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0624 - Gig Harbor Wa Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.1 6.1 14 0 0
2021 9.3 7.0 21 0 0
2020 11.4 9.2 26 0 0
2019 10.3 8.9 21 1 0
2018 9.3 8.3 19 0 0
2017 7.2 6.2 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · WA · Gig Harbor

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 53 employers in Gig Harbor, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 0640 - KAUAI HI WHSE 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0682 - ALBANY OR WHSE 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1266 - DALLAS TX WHSE 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0429 - SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CA WHSE 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2187 293 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2662-2036 293 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flexe Office 293 FTE
STATE-SIZE WA394 MOUNT ST VINCENT-SEATTLE HR 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR 46180001-461801 FRANCISCAN HEALTH ST ANTHONY HOSPITAL 828 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-46180001-461801 730 FTE
CITY-NEAR 701-00691 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1205 - Gig Harbor 189 FTE
NAT-TCR 0640 - Kauai Hi Whse 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZWMP 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Monroe Campus 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Harrison Terrace 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1091 - Lodi Ca Whse 293 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0746 - Lake Elsinore Ca Whse 293 FTE
NAT-SIZE ADESA Dallas 293 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Ritz-Carlton Dove Mountain 293 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.