Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · Illinois

0779 - Mount Prospect Il Whse

Mt Prospect, IL · ~210 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0779 - Mount Prospect Il Whse runs at 268% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade F.

0779 - Mount Prospect Il Whse: 9.1 TCR = 268% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0779 - Mount Prospect Il Whse safety composite

0779 - Mount Prospect Il Whse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

0779 - Mount Prospect Il Whse: 9.2 → 12.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 12.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.33× in 2022

0779 - Mount Prospect Il Whse's TCR rose 3.5 from 9.2 in 2016 to 12.7 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Mt Prospect, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 268% of ind

  • DART 12.1 DART
  • RANK #43/46
  • PHOTO 2532-25320045
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 100 inj
  • SIZE ~210 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2532-25320045 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

0779 - Mount Prospect Il Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0779 - Mount Prospect Il Whse averages 9.1 TCR (268% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0779 - Mount Prospect Il Whse TCR series: 2016=9.2 · 2017=7.8 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=7.6 · 2020=10.6 · 2021=10.7 · 2022=12.7 · BLS 3.4

Where 0779 - Mount Prospect Il Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 46 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in Illinois.

0779 - Mount Prospect Il Whse (210 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 0779 - Mount Prospect Il Whse
0779 - Mount Prospect Il Whse (210 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0779 - Mount Prospect Il Whse has fewer employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 12.7 12.1 23 0 0
2021 10.7 10.1 16 2 0
2020 10.6 10.6 17 0 0
2019 7.6 7.0 12 0 0
2018 5.3 5.3 8 0 0
2017 7.8 6.4 11 0 0
2016 9.2 7.0 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · IL · Mt Prospect

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 9 employers in Mt Prospect, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2532-25320045 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 25320203 SOUTHINGTON, CT 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2532-25320018 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2532-25320357 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Luhr Crosby LLC. 210 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dynomax Inc. D6 210 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Bearing Corp. 210 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyster-Yale Group 210 FTE
CITY-NEAR NTN Bearing Corporation of America (NBCA) - Corporate 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carson's 204 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOUNT PROSPECT IL - 3131 183 FTE
CITY-NEAR 101MTP 46 FTE
NAT-TCR St. Joseph Manor 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Duran Golf Club, LLC. 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverside Treatment 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Truss Craft Structural Componeents of Wyoming Inc 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0633 - Helena Mt Whse 210 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1249 - Wesley Chapel Fl Whse 210 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1342 - Fairbanks Ak Whse 210 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZDNL 210 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.