Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · Michigan

0784 - Grand Rapids Mi Whse

Grand Rapids, MI · ~249 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0784 - Grand Rapids Mi Whse runs at 180% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade D.

0784 - Grand Rapids Mi Whse: 6.1 TCR = 180% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0784 - Grand Rapids Mi Whse safety composite

0784 - Grand Rapids Mi Whse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2022

0784 - Grand Rapids Mi Whse injury rate improved

0784 - Grand Rapids Mi Whse's TCR fell 2.8 from 8.0 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.0 · 2017=7.6 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 180% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #135/141
  • PHOTO 25320181 FORT LAUDER…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 77 inj
  • SIZE ~249 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 25320181 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

0784 - Grand Rapids Mi Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0784 - Grand Rapids Mi Whse averages 6.1 TCR (180% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0784 - Grand Rapids Mi Whse TCR series: 2016=8 · 2017=7.6 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=5.2 · BLS 3.4

Where 0784 - Grand Rapids Mi Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #135 safest of 141 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in Michigan.

0784 - Grand Rapids Mi Whse (249 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 0784 - Grand Rapids Mi Whse
0784 - Grand Rapids Mi Whse (249 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0784 - Grand Rapids Mi Whse has fewer employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.2 5.2 11 0 0
2021 6.2 4.2 12 0 0
2020 6.3 6.3 12 0 0
2019 2.8 2.8 5 0 0
2018 6.8 4.5 12 0 0
2017 7.6 7.6 12 1 0
2016 8.0 8.0 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · MI · Grand Rapids

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 25320181 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0133 - REDDING CA WHSE 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 701-00122 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 701-00172 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1000 - BELFOR Birmingham MI 249 FTE
STATE-SIZE Superior Foods Company 249 FTE
STATE-SIZE MI-WYOMI01-Wyoming - 333 249 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meijer Inc 191 249 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR 0133 - Redding Ca Whse 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR R-cold, Inc 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Global Security Glazing 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pathways Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0634 - Northeast Louisville Ky Whse 249 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0349 - Lenexa Ks Whse 249 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0189 - Town Center Ga Whse 249 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0743 - Alpharetta Ga Whse 249 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.