Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning Contractors · Arizona

0d53 - Phoenix Fire

Phoenix, AZ · ~94 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0d53 - Phoenix Fire runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning Contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

0d53 - Phoenix Fire: 2.1 TCR = 75% of Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning Contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0d53 - Phoenix Fire safety composite

0d53 - Phoenix Fire scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2024

0d53 - Phoenix Fire injury rate improved

0d53 - Phoenix Fire's TCR fell 2.7 from 5.4 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.4 · 2017=1.1 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 75% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #45/131
  • PHOTO New England Mechanic…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: New England Mechanical Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

0d53 - Phoenix Fire in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0d53 - Phoenix Fire averages 2.1 TCR (75% of the Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0d53 - Phoenix Fire TCR series: 2016=5.4 · 2017=1.1 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 2.8

Where 0d53 - Phoenix Fire falls in its industry

5,793 Plumbing, Heating and Air Cond establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 131 Plumbing, Heating and Air Cond employers in Arizona.

0d53 - Phoenix Fire (94 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 0d53 - Phoenix Fire
0d53 - Phoenix Fire (94 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

0d53 - Phoenix Fire has more employees than the Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning C median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 2.7 3 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2022 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2021 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.3 3.2 4 0 0
2017 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2016 5.4 4.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · AZ · Phoenix

5,793 Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR New England Mechanical Services, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FRESH MEADOW MECHANICAL CORP. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seneca Mechanical, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stellar Industrial Solutions Inc. 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE MFIB 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilbane Building Company Arizona 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE J. Banicki Construction Company 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7319_16819 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR 650 - Searcy 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 442 - Stevens Point 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 205 - Raleigh-Durham 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Chesterfield Residency 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aluminum Boats ThunderJet Clarkston 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE 464 - Mat Machine Only Plt 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evonik Corporation 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mar-Mac Industries, Inc. 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.