Belt conveyor systems manufacturing · Colorado

0SG Interroll Engineering West, Inc.

Canon City, CO · ~96 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0SG Interroll Engineering West, Inc. runs at 385% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Belt conveyor systems manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

0SG Interroll Engineering West, Inc.: 12.7 TCR = 385% of Belt conveyor systems manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0SG Interroll Engineering West, Inc. safety composite

0SG Interroll Engineering West, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.3

2018→2020

0SG Interroll Engineering West, Inc. injury rate improved

0SG Interroll Engineering West, Inc.'s TCR fell 8.3 from 16.5 in 2018 to 8.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=16.5 · 2019=13.4 · 2020=8.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333922 · Canon City, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.7 · 385% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Magnum Systems, Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Magnum Systems, Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

0SG Interroll Engineering West, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0SG Interroll Engineering West, Inc. averages 12.7 TCR (385% of the Belt conveyor systems manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0SG Interroll Engineering West, Inc. TCR series: 2018=16.5 · 2019=13.4 · 2020=8.2 · BLS 3.3

Where 0SG Interroll Engineering West, Inc. falls in its industry

361 Belt conveyor systems manufact establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Belt conveyor systems manufact employers in Colorado.

0SG Interroll Engineering West, Inc. (96 employees, TCR 12.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 0SG Interroll Engineering West, Inc.
0SG Interroll Engineering West, Inc. (96 employees, TCR 12.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5

0SG Interroll Engineering West, Inc. has more employees than the Belt conveyor systems manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 8.2 0.0 7 0 0
2019 13.4 4.5 12 0 0
2018 16.5 5.8 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333922 · CO · Canon City

361 Belt conveyor systems manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 39 employers in Canon City, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Magnum Systems, Inc. 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wm. W. Meyer & Sons, Inc. 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Industries, Inc. - 104 Division 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Air-Draulic Engineering Co., Inc. 12.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lookout Center 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rice Lake West 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pierson's Concrete Construction CO 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Copeland Enterprises, Inc. dba Copeland Precast, Inc. 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Thomas More Hospital 477 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1019 313 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1019 309 FTE
CITY-NEAR 620-00417 120 FTE
NAT-TCR Synergy Florida 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR SawMill 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-10121) 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Regional Behavioral Health Center 12.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mauser - Mason 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miller's Smorgasbord 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Eastern Michigan Rehabilitation and Opportunity Center 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Hardware Distributing Co - Corporate Office 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.