Industrial Launderers · California

0w01 - Central Pacific Centralized Ar

Sacramento, CA · ~20 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0w01 - Central Pacific Centralized Ar runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial Launderers workplace, earning a grade A.

0w01 - Central Pacific Centralized Ar: 0.9 TCR = 42% of Industrial Launderers BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0w01 - Central Pacific Centralized Ar safety composite

0w01 - Central Pacific Centralized Ar scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

0w01 - Central Pacific Centralized Ar held a steady TCR band

0w01 - Central Pacific Centralized Ar's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 812332 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/92
  • PHOTO 272 272-LITTLE ROCK AR
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 272 272-LITTLE ROCK AR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

0w01 - Central Pacific Centralized Ar in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0w01 - Central Pacific Centralized Ar averages 0.9 TCR (42% of the Industrial Launderers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0w01 - Central Pacific Centralized Ar TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.1

Where 0w01 - Central Pacific Centralized Ar falls in its industry

917 Industrial Launderers establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 92 Industrial Launderers employers in California.

0w01 - Central Pacific Centralized Ar (20 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 0w01 - Central Pacific Centralized Ar
0w01 - Central Pacific Centralized Ar (20 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 3.1

0w01 - Central Pacific Centralized Ar has fewer employees than the Industrial Launderers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

812332 · CA · Sacramento

917 Industrial Launderers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 272 272-LITTLE ROCK AR 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 301 301-BOSTON MA 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 566 566-SAVANNAH GA 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 042K - SOUTH AUSTIN TX RNTL 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sills Farms, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE F A Maggiore & Sons, LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE CALMEX CONTRACTING INC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Velvet Antler Ranch LLC 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Kirwan Surgical Products, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Optima Chemical Group, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sandhills Utility Services, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tecomet 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 607 * Wenatchee 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yoder Industries, Inc. Production Ct 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE GreenWood, Inc. - GE Aviation 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pallet Express Inc 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.