Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · Washington

1013 - Union Gap Wa Whse

Union Gap, WA · ~330 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

1013 - Union Gap Wa Whse runs at 207% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade F.

1013 - Union Gap Wa Whse: 7.0 TCR = 207% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

1013 - Union Gap Wa Whse safety composite

1013 - Union Gap Wa Whse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

1013 - Union Gap Wa Whse: 5.4 → 8.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 10.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.03× in 2022

1013 - Union Gap Wa Whse's TCR rose 3.0 from 5.4 in 2017 to 8.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Union Gap, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 207% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #87/120
  • PHOTO 0380 - LINCOLN PARK …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 102 inj
  • SIZE ~330 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 0380 - LINCOLN PARK IL WHSE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

1013 - Union Gap Wa Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 1013 - Union Gap Wa Whse averages 7.0 TCR (207% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

1013 - Union Gap Wa Whse TCR series: 2017=5.4 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=7 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=10.5 · 2022=8.4 · BLS 3.4

Where 1013 - Union Gap Wa Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 120 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in Washington.

1013 - Union Gap Wa Whse (330 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 1013 - Union Gap Wa Whse
1013 - Union Gap Wa Whse (330 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

1013 - Union Gap Wa Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.4 7.3 22 0 0
2021 10.5 6.6 27 0 0
2020 5.6 2.8 13 1 0
2019 7.0 4.8 16 0 0
2018 5.3 4.4 12 0 0
2017 5.4 4.5 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · WA · Union Gap

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 36 employers in Union Gap, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 0380 - LINCOLN PARK IL WHSE 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0318 - BROOKLYN NY WHSE 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 701-00031 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 25320211 NORTHBORO, MA 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 701-00093 330 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEA 330 FTE
STATE-SIZE DEPT OF COMMERCE -- COMMUNITY TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 330 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAS Quincy 331 FTE
CITY-NEAR CRO 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbia Valley Fruit, LLC 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Window Systems 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR WAYAK - YAKIMA 147 FTE
NAT-TCR 0380 - Lincoln Park Il Whse 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 0318 - Brooklyn Ny Whse 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Nemco Food Equipment 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lincoln Tower 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0424 - Signal Hill Ca Whse 330 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Chicago Lighthouse for People Who Are Blind or Visually Impaired - ISTHA Call Center 330 FTE
NAT-SIZE IAH-SCS 330 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Petroleum Laboratories, Inc. 330 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.