Commercial and Institutional Building Construction · Florida

101913 - Orlando Intermodal South Terminal

Orlando, FL · ~48 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

101913 - Orlando Intermodal South Terminal runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Commercial and Institutional Building Construction workplace, earning a grade B.

101913 - Orlando Intermodal South Terminal: 1.6 TCR = 57% of Commercial and Institutional Building Construction BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

101913 - Orlando Intermodal South Terminal safety composite

101913 - Orlando Intermodal South Terminal scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2016→2017

101913 - Orlando Intermodal South Terminal injury rate improved

101913 - Orlando Intermodal South Terminal's TCR fell 3.3 from 3.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.3 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Orlando, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #107/218
  • PHOTO Fulcrum Construction…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fulcrum Construction, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

101913 - Orlando Intermodal South Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 101913 - Orlando Intermodal South Terminal averages 1.6 TCR (57% of the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

101913 - Orlando Intermodal South Terminal TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=0 · BLS 2.9

Where 101913 - Orlando Intermodal South Terminal falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial and Institutional B establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #107 safest of 218 Commercial and Institutional B employers in Florida.

101913 - Orlando Intermodal South Terminal (48 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate 101913 - Orlando Intermodal South Terminal
101913 - Orlando Intermodal South Terminal (48 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

101913 - Orlando Intermodal South Terminal has fewer employees than the Commercial and Institutional Building Co median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.3 2.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · FL · Orlando

4,692 Commercial and Institutional Building Construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fulcrum Construction, Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPAN Construction and Engineering 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inline Commercial Construction Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR B-D Construction Inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE WAWA SITE - 5295 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE 96920035-1 FRANMAR CORPORATION-FRANMAR CORPORATION 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE American House - Lutz 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haines Air Conditioning 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Manheim Keystone Pennsylvania 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR USS Irvin Works 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Childress Klein Atlanta Galleria 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Fifth Ave 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Truman Valley Healthcare Inc 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Malden LLC 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southeast Connections LLc ( Savannah, Georgia) 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Building 21/CP/Fleet /Maint 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.