Food processing plant construction · Texas

103225 - Nestle Hereford Merrick Petfood Expansion

Hereford, TX · ~37 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

103225 - Nestle Hereford Merrick Petfood Expansion runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Food processing plant construction workplace, earning a grade A.

103225 - Nestle Hereford Merrick Petfood Expansion: 0.7 TCR = 24% of Food processing plant construction BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

103225 - Nestle Hereford Merrick Petfood Expansion safety composite

103225 - Nestle Hereford Merrick Petfood Expansion scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

103225 - Nestle Hereford Merrick Petfood Expansion held a steady TCR band

103225 - Nestle Hereford Merrick Petfood Expansion's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Hereford, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #67/92
  • PHOTO Forcum Lannom Contra…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Forcum Lannom Contractors, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

103225 - Nestle Hereford Merrick Petfood Expansion in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 103225 - Nestle Hereford Merrick Petfood Expansion averages 0.7 TCR (24% of the Food processing plant construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

103225 - Nestle Hereford Merrick Petfood Expansion TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=0 · BLS 2.9

Where 103225 - Nestle Hereford Merrick Petfood Expansion falls in its industry

924 Food processing plant construc establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 92 Food processing plant construc employers in Texas.

103225 - Nestle Hereford Merrick Petfood Expansion (37 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 103225 - Nestle Hereford Merrick Petfood Expansion
103225 - Nestle Hereford Merrick Petfood Expansion (37 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

103225 - Nestle Hereford Merrick Petfood Expansion has fewer employees than the Food processing plant construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.1 1.1 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · TX · Hereford

924 Food processing plant construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 38 employers in Hereford, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Forcum Lannom Contractors, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PDS 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marketech International Corporation USA 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITAC 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fannin Growing 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bovina Cattle Company 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Skyland Grain, LLC- Spearman Gin 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alura Cogen 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Caviness Beef 1,334 FTE
CITY-NEAR Caviness 781 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle Purina Pet Car (Merrick Pet Care) 372 FTE
CITY-NEAR Merrick Petcare 366 FTE
NAT-TCR North Canton HQ 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 2337 Shoppers-Rolling Valley (Sv 052 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Miami III 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Downers Grove, IL 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Old Town Alexandria - Resort 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3495-11DG090 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE QSI Dawson 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 316-Folkston 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.