Bridge construction · California

103239 - Fullerton Creek Channel Improvement Project

Buena Park, CA · ~15 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

103239 - Fullerton Creek Channel Improvement Project runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bridge construction workplace, earning a grade A.

103239 - Fullerton Creek Channel Improvement Project: 1.0 TCR = 36% of Bridge construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

103239 - Fullerton Creek Channel Improvement Project safety composite

103239 - Fullerton Creek Channel Improvement Project scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

103239 - Fullerton Creek Channel Improvement Project held a steady TCR band

103239 - Fullerton Creek Channel Improvement Project's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=5.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Buena Park, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #306/551
  • PHOTO Boh Bros. Constructi…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~15 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Boh Bros. Construction Co., L.L.C. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

103239 - Fullerton Creek Channel Improvement Project in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 103239 - Fullerton Creek Channel Improvement Project averages 1.0 TCR (36% of the Bridge construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

103239 - Fullerton Creek Channel Improvement Project TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=5 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.8

Where 103239 - Fullerton Creek Channel Improvement Project falls in its industry

4,078 Bridge construction establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #306 safest of 551 Bridge construction employers in California.

103239 - Fullerton Creek Channel Improvement Project (15 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate 103239 - Fullerton Creek Channel Improvement Project
103239 - Fullerton Creek Channel Improvement Project (15 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

103239 - Fullerton Creek Channel Improvement Project has fewer employees than the Bridge construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · CA · Buena Park

4,078 Bridge construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 112 employers in Buena Park, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Boh Bros. Construction Co., L.L.C. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR R.L. McCoy Inc. Columbia City 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Graves County Road Department 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Specialized Construction Inc 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE JK FARMS 15 FTE
STATE-SIZE workers 15 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pajaro Valley 15 FTE
STATE-SIZE MMF-Hemet 15 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : LAX5 1,220 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-041 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LAX5 898 FTE
CITY-NEAR BUENA PARK CA 831 FTE
NAT-TCR Providence RP 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Scientific Research Corporation 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Menomonie Service Center 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Construction 1.0 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.