Fire and flood restoration of commercial and institutional buildings · California

1039 - BELFOR Hayward CA

Hayward, CA · ~36 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

1039 - BELFOR Hayward CA runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fire and flood restoration of commercial and institutional buildings workplace, earning a grade D.

1039 - BELFOR Hayward CA: 3.5 TCR = 121% of Fire and flood restoration of commercial and institutional buildings BLS 2.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

1039 - BELFOR Hayward CA safety composite

1039 - BELFOR Hayward CA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

1039 - BELFOR Hayward CA: 0.0 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 6.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.57× in 2024

1039 - BELFOR Hayward CA's TCR rose 2.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Hayward, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.5 · 121% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #313/486
  • PHOTO Neumann Brothers, Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Neumann Brothers, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

1039 - BELFOR Hayward CA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 1039 - BELFOR Hayward CA averages 3.5 TCR (121% of the Fire and flood restoration of commercial and institutional buildings BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

1039 - BELFOR Hayward CA TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=2 · BLS 2.9

Where 1039 - BELFOR Hayward CA falls in its industry

4,692 Fire and flood restoration of establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #313 safest of 486 Fire and flood restoration of employers in California.

1039 - BELFOR Hayward CA (36 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate 1039 - BELFOR Hayward CA
1039 - BELFOR Hayward CA (36 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

1039 - BELFOR Hayward CA has fewer employees than the Fire and flood restoration of commercial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2023 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.9 6.9 2 0 0
2020 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2019 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2018 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2017 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Hayward

4,692 Fire and flood restoration of commercial and institutional buildings employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 336 employers in Hayward, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Neumann Brothers, Inc 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CONSTRUCTION 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Russell P. LeFrois Builder, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keers Remediation Inc. 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE River Garden Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knight Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.H. MEEK & SONS INC. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dirt Farmer and Company 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 518 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 100 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 117 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Rose Hospital 929 FTE
NAT-TCR GUAYNABO 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Crystal Clinic Orthopaedic Center 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlas Minerals & Chemicals Inc 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CenterPoint Energy - Muncie 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Waynesboro Office, 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buckeye Machine Fabricators, Inc. 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rutan Poly Industries 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 574 Albany 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.