Nuclear waste disposal site construction · Idaho

104504 - INL Navy SFHP Structural Erection

Idaho Falls, ID · ~68 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

104504 - INL Navy SFHP Structural Erection runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nuclear waste disposal site construction workplace, earning a grade A.

104504 - INL Navy SFHP Structural Erection: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Nuclear waste disposal site construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

104504 - INL Navy SFHP Structural Erection safety composite

104504 - INL Navy SFHP Structural Erection scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

104504 - INL Navy SFHP Structural Erection: 0.0 → 0.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 0.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

104504 - INL Navy SFHP Structural Erection's TCR rose 0.9 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Idaho Falls, ID AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO Perras Excavating, I…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Perras Excavating, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

104504 - INL Navy SFHP Structural Erection in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 104504 - INL Navy SFHP Structural Erection averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Nuclear waste disposal site construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

104504 - INL Navy SFHP Structural Erection TCR series: 2021=0 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 2.8

Where 104504 - INL Navy SFHP Structural Erection falls in its industry

932 Nuclear waste disposal site co establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Nuclear waste disposal site co employers in Idaho.

104504 - INL Navy SFHP Structural Erection (68 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 104504 - INL Navy SFHP Structural Erection
104504 - INL Navy SFHP Structural Erection (68 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

104504 - INL Navy SFHP Structural Erection has fewer employees than the Nuclear waste disposal site construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · ID · Idaho Falls

932 Nuclear waste disposal site construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 189 employers in Idaho Falls, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Perras Excavating, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rice Lake West 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shell Chemical LP Geismar LA 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TRAC-WORK, INC. 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE D&A Glass 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Upson Company 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE DFA FLUID - BOISE ID 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE BREWSTER CHEESE COMPANY 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOUNTAIN VIEW HOSPITAL 1,627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastern Idaho Regional Medical Center 1,479 FTE
CITY-NEAR Idaho Falls Community Hospital 536 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5494 472 FTE
NAT-TCR ROE Dental Laboratory, INC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Monroe Township, NJ - 12 Costco Drive 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Distribution Center 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CO CBM Laboratory 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corteva STJ1 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Luke's Rehabilitation Hospital, LLC 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE HCA Houston Healthcare Conroe - EVS 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Christus Santa Rosa Hospital Westover - EVS 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.