Fire and flood restoration of commercial and institutional buildings · Arizona

1046 - BELFOR Phoenix AZ

Phoenix, AZ · ~23 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

1046 - BELFOR Phoenix AZ runs at 171% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fire and flood restoration of commercial and institutional buildings workplace, earning a grade D.

1046 - BELFOR Phoenix AZ: 5.0 TCR = 171% of Fire and flood restoration of commercial and institutional buildings BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

1046 - BELFOR Phoenix AZ safety composite

1046 - BELFOR Phoenix AZ scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

1046 - BELFOR Phoenix AZ: 0.0 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 16.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.68× in 2022

1046 - BELFOR Phoenix AZ's TCR rose 3.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 171% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #86/106
  • PHOTO CD Smith Constructio…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CD Smith Construction Bakers Place Apts (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

1046 - BELFOR Phoenix AZ in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 1046 - BELFOR Phoenix AZ averages 5.0 TCR (171% of the Fire and flood restoration of commercial and institutional buildings BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

1046 - BELFOR Phoenix AZ TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=16.9 · 2019=0 · 2021=9.6 · 2022=3.4 · BLS 2.9

Where 1046 - BELFOR Phoenix AZ falls in its industry

4,692 Fire and flood restoration of establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 106 Fire and flood restoration of employers in Arizona.

1046 - BELFOR Phoenix AZ (23 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate 1046 - BELFOR Phoenix AZ
1046 - BELFOR Phoenix AZ (23 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

1046 - BELFOR Phoenix AZ has fewer employees than the Fire and flood restoration of commercial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2021 9.6 9.6 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 16.9 16.9 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · AZ · Phoenix

4,692 Fire and flood restoration of commercial and institutional buildings employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CD Smith Construction Bakers Place Apts 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henry Carlson Construction 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regal Commercial Services 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Construction Engineers Inc 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nakase Brothers Wholesale Nursery AZ 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eloy Farm 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE McClintock Dairy, LLP - MDL266 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coolidge 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Villages at Fortune Place 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Okuls - Tulsa 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HG1033 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-01231 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goodwill Laitner 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG766 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sauk Prairie Healthcare - River Valley Clinic 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grain Craft 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.