General services departments, government · California

1110 N. Eastern Ave.

Los Angeles, CA · ~155 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

1110 N. Eastern Ave. runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General services departments, government workplace, earning a grade B.

1110 N. Eastern Ave.: 2.1 TCR = 67% of General services departments, government BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

1110 N. Eastern Ave. safety composite

1110 N. Eastern Ave. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2018→2024

1110 N. Eastern Ave. injury rate improved

1110 N. Eastern Ave.'s TCR fell 2.7 from 4.8 in 2018 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.8 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.0 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Los Angeles, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 67% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #58/256
  • PHOTO Town of Leland: Muni…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~155 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Town of Leland: Municipal Operations Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

1110 N. Eastern Ave. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 1110 N. Eastern Ave. averages 2.1 TCR (67% of the General services departments, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

1110 N. Eastern Ave. TCR series: 2018=4.8 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=2 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.2

Where 1110 N. Eastern Ave. falls in its industry

1,496 General services departments, establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 256 General services departments, employers in California.

1110 N. Eastern Ave. (155 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate 1110 N. Eastern Ave.
1110 N. Eastern Ave. (155 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

1110 N. Eastern Ave. has more employees than the General services departments, government median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2023 2.2 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2018 4.8 3.8 14 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · CA · Los Angeles

1,496 General services departments, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Town of Leland: Municipal Operations Center 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Chicago Dept of Assets, Information and Services - 2 N. La Salle St. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Chicago Dept of Fleet and Facility Management - 3104 W. Harrison St. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Facility Services 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE T&A - Oxnard - Harvest 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treehouse California Almonds 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARTURO GODINEZ 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE BEACH CITIES CONSTRUCT/FLD SRVS - 1 155 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR OBDL Corvallis 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Injectec, Inc 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Downstream & Chemicals - Charleston, SC Lubricants Plant 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Budsgunshop.Com, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE OD Tile 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clovernook Healthcare LLC 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE BSI 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE Polk County 155 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.