Printing, digital (e.g., billboards, other large format graphical materials, high resolution) (except books, gre · New York

12 Pixley Industrial

Rochester, NY · ~31 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

12 Pixley Industrial runs at 334% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Printing, digital (e.g., billboards, other large format graphical materials, high resolution) (except books, gre workplace, earning a grade F.

12 Pixley Industrial: 11.0 TCR = 334% of Printing, digital (e.g., billboards, other large format graphical materials, high resolution) (except books, gre BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

12 Pixley Industrial safety composite

12 Pixley Industrial scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

12 Pixley Industrial: 11.0 → 76.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 76.0 TCR · DART/TCR 6.89× in 2021

12 Pixley Industrial's TCR rose 65.0 from 11.0 in 2020 to 76.0 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 6.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Rochester, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.0 · 334% of ind

  • DART 76.0 DART
  • RANK #106/106
  • PHOTO HESPERIA
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HESPERIA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

12 Pixley Industrial in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 12 Pixley Industrial averages 11.0 TCR (334% of the Printing, digital (e.g., billboards, other large format graphical materials, high resolution) (except books, gre BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

12 Pixley Industrial TCR series: 2020=11 · 2021=76 · BLS 3.3

Where 12 Pixley Industrial falls in its industry

2,001 Printing, digital (e.g., billb establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #106 safest of 106 Printing, digital (e.g., billb employers in New York.

12 Pixley Industrial (31 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 12 Pixley Industrial
12 Pixley Industrial (31 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

12 Pixley Industrial has fewer employees than the Printing, digital (e.g., billboards, oth median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 76.0 76.0 1 21 0
2020 11.0 8.3 1 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · NY · Rochester

2,001 Printing, digital (e.g., billboards, other large format graphical materials, high resolution) (except books, gre employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HESPERIA 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Creative Labels Inc. 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Black Rhino Display, Inc. 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR JET Printing 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eldred Brothers / Main Farm 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fox Fruit Farms LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASC Kirkwood 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : OM - New Athens 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR Alden Estates of Naperville 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Customized - FL - 0804 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR IFS Coatings, Inc. (Oklahoma) 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 062/Little Rock 11.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Honeywell Electronic Chemicals - Bryan 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Environmental Health 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quincy, IL Hauling 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1915 Colvin Court 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.