Fire sprinkler system installation · Nebraska

129000 - CFS Job Cost Omaha

Omaha, NE · ~153 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

129000 - CFS Job Cost Omaha runs at 9% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fire sprinkler system installation workplace, earning a grade A.

129000 - CFS Job Cost Omaha: 0.3 TCR = 9% of Fire sprinkler system installation BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

129000 - CFS Job Cost Omaha safety composite

129000 - CFS Job Cost Omaha scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

129000 - CFS Job Cost Omaha held a steady TCR band

129000 - CFS Job Cost Omaha's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.7 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Omaha, NE AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 9% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/49
  • PHOTO Horizon Services - HSS
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~153 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Horizon Services - HSS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

129000 - CFS Job Cost Omaha in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 129000 - CFS Job Cost Omaha averages 0.3 TCR (9% of the Fire sprinkler system installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

129000 - CFS Job Cost Omaha TCR series: 2017=0.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 2.8

Where 129000 - CFS Job Cost Omaha falls in its industry

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installa establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 49 Fire sprinkler system installa employers in Nebraska.

129000 - CFS Job Cost Omaha (153 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 129000 - CFS Job Cost Omaha
129000 - CFS Job Cost Omaha (153 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

129000 - CFS Job Cost Omaha has more employees than the Fire sprinkler system installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · NE · Omaha

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Horizon Services - HSS 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mid-South Fire Solutions LLC 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR FM Sylvan, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BT Mount Laurel 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Valmont Irrigation 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Husker Auto Group LLC 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amber Pharmacy 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE PSSI - 0127 Tyson Foods Inc. - Lexington 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers 9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nebraska Medicine 8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL 2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR Rahway, NJ Facility 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Arc Remanufacturing Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR DRL Enterprises Inc 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dublin Office (3535) 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE BERRYAHSK 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Churchill Commons Giant Eagle 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knepper Press Corporation 153 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.