Mail and Parcel Delivery · Illinois

161502-Chi-Auburn Park Sta

Chicago, IL · ~112 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

161502-Chi-Auburn Park Sta runs at 437% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mail and Parcel Delivery workplace, earning a grade F.

161502-Chi-Auburn Park Sta: 19.7 TCR = 437% of Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

161502-Chi-Auburn Park Sta safety composite

161502-Chi-Auburn Park Sta scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.1

2017→2022

161502-Chi-Auburn Park Sta injury rate improved

161502-Chi-Auburn Park Sta's TCR fell 7.1 from 23.0 in 2017 to 15.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 34.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=23.0 · 2018=34.4 · 2019=18.1 · 2020=17.1 · 2021=9.5 · 2022=15.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 19.7 · 437% of ind

  • DART 11.9 DART
  • RANK #581/599
  • PHOTO JENSEN DRIVE_1368393
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 107 inj
  • SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JENSEN DRIVE_1368393 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

161502-Chi-Auburn Park Sta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 161502-Chi-Auburn Park Sta averages 19.7 TCR (437% of the Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

161502-Chi-Auburn Park Sta TCR series: 2017=23 · 2018=34.4 · 2019=18.1 · 2020=17.1 · 2021=9.5 · 2022=15.9 · BLS 4.5

Where 161502-Chi-Auburn Park Sta falls in its industry

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #581 safest of 599 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers in Illinois.

161502-Chi-Auburn Park Sta (112 employees, TCR 19.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 161502-Chi-Auburn Park Sta
161502-Chi-Auburn Park Sta (112 employees, TCR 19.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

161502-Chi-Auburn Park Sta has more employees than the Mail and Parcel Delivery median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 15.9 11.9 13 3 0
2021 9.5 8.5 10 0 0
2020 17.1 17.1 16 1 0
2019 18.1 18.1 16 2 0
2018 34.4 34.4 32 1 0
2017 23.0 23.0 20 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · IL · Chicago

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JENSEN DRIVE_1368393 19.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPIRIT LAKE_1382491 19.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MELROSE PARK_1372652 19.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 355185-MEDINA PO 19.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Home Forever Baths Company (DBA- Pacific Bath Chicago) 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lindblad Construction Company of Joliet, Inc. 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE G. E. Riddiford Company, Inc. 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE FE Moran Special Hazards 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR 6458-ZOAK 19.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1315 19.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Alliance Industries - Menasha 19.7 TCR
NAT-TCR WORC 19.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 254400-Holland Po 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE 488711-Sug-First Colony Sta 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE 204793-Lou-Annshire Anx 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE 340143-Abq-Rio Rancho Br 112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.