Mail and Parcel Delivery · Illinois

161528-Chi-Jefferson Park Carrier Anx

Chicago, IL · ~74 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

161528-Chi-Jefferson Park Carrier Anx runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Mail and Parcel Delivery workplace, earning a grade D.

161528-Chi-Jefferson Park Carrier Anx: 5.5 TCR = 123% of Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

161528-Chi-Jefferson Park Carrier Anx safety composite

161528-Chi-Jefferson Park Carrier Anx scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

161528-Chi-Jefferson Park Carrier Anx: 4.4 → 7.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 7.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.42× in 2022

161528-Chi-Jefferson Park Carrier Anx's TCR rose 3.4 from 4.4 in 2017 to 7.8 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 123% of ind

  • DART 7.8 DART
  • RANK #151/599
  • PHOTO CRYSTAL LAKE_1359961
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CRYSTAL LAKE_1359961 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

161528-Chi-Jefferson Park Carrier Anx in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 161528-Chi-Jefferson Park Carrier Anx averages 5.5 TCR (123% of the Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

161528-Chi-Jefferson Park Carrier Anx TCR series: 2017=4.4 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=6 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=7.8 · BLS 4.5

Where 161528-Chi-Jefferson Park Carrier Anx falls in its industry

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #151 safest of 599 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers in Illinois.

161528-Chi-Jefferson Park Carrier Anx (74 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 161528-Chi-Jefferson Park Carrier Anx
161528-Chi-Jefferson Park Carrier Anx (74 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

161528-Chi-Jefferson Park Carrier Anx has more employees than the Mail and Parcel Delivery median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.8 7.8 0 5 0
2021 4.7 4.7 2 1 0
2020 4.4 4.4 3 0 0
2019 6.0 6.0 4 0 0
2018 5.8 5.8 4 0 0
2017 4.4 4.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · IL · Chicago

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CRYSTAL LAKE_1359961 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CRESTVIEW_1359825 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR FAIR OAKS_1362943 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR OAK PARK HTS CARRIER ANNEX_1375726 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience LLC 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works- Water & Sewer Dept. 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Normandy Construction Co. Inc 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE 105652 - Cass County Solar 150 MW AC 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR 259190-Temperance Po 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 388617-Wapakoneta Po 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 206128-Pikeville Po 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 110864-Boc-Downtown Sta 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 216576-Nor-Elmwood Sta 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE 266308-Min-Coon Rapids Br 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE 040774-Bentonville Po 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE 398340-Tul-Northeast Sta 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.