Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · California

163

Travis Afb, CA · ~28 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

163 runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade A.

163: 0.5 TCR = 10% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

163 safety composite

163 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

163 held a steady TCR band

163's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Travis Afb, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/120
  • PHOTO Lockheed Martin Corp…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lockheed Martin Corporation Eglin AFB FL-1107 Luton Dr (3715) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

163 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 163 averages 0.5 TCR (10% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

163 TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where 163 falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 120 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in California.

163 (28 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 163
163 (28 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

163 has fewer employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · CA · Travis Afb

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 6 employers in Travis Afb, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Eglin AFB FL-1107 Luton Dr (3715) 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eulen Aviation TPA Station 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NGAS-A588 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MD - Hagerstown 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Davis Ranch L.L.C. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steinbeck Country Produce 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harlan Family Ranch 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE KKG Equipment Company, LLC32 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR TRAVIS CUSTODIAL 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Travis AFB Food Service 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Travis AFB Landscape 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR C5 ATS TRAVIS 23 FTE
NAT-TCR Specialty Machine 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- St. Louis Facility 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Plymouth 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Accu-Grind & Mfg Co Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Doyle & Roth Mfg. Co., Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake Road Generating Company LLC 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elkin Hatchery 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bioclean Mobile Wash, Inc. 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.