General Warehousing & Storage · Texas

1987 - Dallas Tx Return Center

Dallas, TX · ~44 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

1987 - Dallas Tx Return Center runs at 160% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General Warehousing & Storage workplace, earning a grade D.

1987 - Dallas Tx Return Center: 9.3 TCR = 160% of General Warehousing & Storage BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

1987 - Dallas Tx Return Center safety composite

1987 - Dallas Tx Return Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2018→2023

1987 - Dallas Tx Return Center injury rate improved

1987 - Dallas Tx Return Center's TCR fell 1.2 from 4.2 in 2018 to 3.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 29.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=12.3 · 2022=29.6 · 2023=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Dallas, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.3 · 160% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #789/846
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

1987 - Dallas Tx Return Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 1987 - Dallas Tx Return Center averages 9.3 TCR (160% of the General Warehousing & Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

1987 - Dallas Tx Return Center TCR series: 2018=4.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=12.3 · 2022=29.6 · 2023=3 · BLS 5.8

Where 1987 - Dallas Tx Return Center falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing & Storage establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #789 safest of 846 General Warehousing & Storage employers in Texas.

1987 - Dallas Tx Return Center (44 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 1987 - Dallas Tx Return Center
1987 - Dallas Tx Return Center (44 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

1987 - Dallas Tx Return Center has fewer employees than the General Warehousing & Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2022 29.6 26.6 10 0 0
2021 12.3 12.3 4 0 0
2020 6.6 6.6 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.2 4.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · Dallas

9,477 General Warehousing & Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEB6 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR KLS MCS IN 2 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Book Fairs - Danbury 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva - Lubbock Research 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE WRANGLER FEED YARD 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Devon Energy Corporation - Cresson 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Driver Directional, Inc. 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Elite Trailer MFG 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR JW Turf Farms, Inc. 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR XBY 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Randolph County Services 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kaw Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #2064 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #2275 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE USE York 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.