General Warehousing & Storage · California

1995 - Mira Loma Ca Return Center

Mira Loma, CA · ~180 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

1995 - Mira Loma Ca Return Center runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General Warehousing & Storage workplace, earning a grade C.

1995 - Mira Loma Ca Return Center: 6.3 TCR = 109% of General Warehousing & Storage BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

1995 - Mira Loma Ca Return Center safety composite

1995 - Mira Loma Ca Return Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

1995 - Mira Loma Ca Return Center: 2.1 → 9.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 13.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.27× in 2023

1995 - Mira Loma Ca Return Center's TCR rose 6.9 from 2.1 in 2017 to 9.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 13.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Mira Loma, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.3 · 109% of ind

  • DART 8.0 DART
  • RANK #793/1131
  • PHOTO EG America- DC, CC, …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 82 inj
  • SIZE ~180 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EG America- DC, CC, Temps (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

1995 - Mira Loma Ca Return Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 1995 - Mira Loma Ca Return Center averages 6.3 TCR (109% of the General Warehousing & Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

1995 - Mira Loma Ca Return Center TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=13.4 · 2022=11.5 · 2023=9 · BLS 5.8

Where 1995 - Mira Loma Ca Return Center falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing & Storage establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #793 safest of 1131 General Warehousing & Storage employers in California.

1995 - Mira Loma Ca Return Center (180 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 1995 - Mira Loma Ca Return Center
1995 - Mira Loma Ca Return Center (180 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

1995 - Mira Loma Ca Return Center has more employees than the General Warehousing & Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.0 8.0 18 0 0
2022 11.5 11.5 24 0 0
2021 13.4 12.4 27 0 0
2020 2.1 2.1 3 0 0
2019 2.8 2.8 4 0 0
2018 3.2 3.2 5 0 0
2017 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Mira Loma

9,477 General Warehousing & Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 87 employers in Mira Loma, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EG America- DC, CC, Temps 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6795-86100B0199 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 99246 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greensboro Distribution Center 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE BALOIAN PACKING CO., INC. 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE AJ FARM LABOR CONTRACTING, INC OFFICE 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2905-29050002-4148 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fowler Packing East 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-014 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0960 - MIRA LOMA CA (DRY) DEPOT 828 FTE
CITY-NEAR Del Real, LLC 585 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIRA LOMA OPERATIONS (CAMRL) 554 FTE
NAT-TCR Temple 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sharkey's Casino 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Henry Schein - PAPHI 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR nVent 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE SupplyHouse New Jersey LLC 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pearl Rivier Distribution Center #83 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Florida : SVC - Miami FL USA 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Castle Hill, Inc. 180 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.