Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures Construction · Florida

20-051 Vehicle Maintenance Facility

Orlando, FL · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

20-051 Vehicle Maintenance Facility runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures Construction workplace, earning a grade B.

20-051 Vehicle Maintenance Facility: 1.5 TCR = 54% of Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures Construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

20-051 Vehicle Maintenance Facility safety composite

20-051 Vehicle Maintenance Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

20-051 Vehicle Maintenance Facility: 0.0 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 3.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.99× in 2021

20-051 Vehicle Maintenance Facility's TCR rose 3.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 3.0 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Orlando, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 54% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #19/121
  • PHOTO Santa Ana Creek Deve…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Santa Ana Creek Development dba Mark Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

20-051 Vehicle Maintenance Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 20-051 Vehicle Maintenance Facility averages 1.5 TCR (54% of the Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures Construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

20-051 Vehicle Maintenance Facility TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=3 · BLS 2.8

Where 20-051 Vehicle Maintenance Facility falls in its industry

1,614 Water and Sewer Line and Relat establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 121 Water and Sewer Line and Relat employers in Florida.

20-051 Vehicle Maintenance Facility (23 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 20-051 Vehicle Maintenance Facility
20-051 Vehicle Maintenance Facility (23 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

20-051 Vehicle Maintenance Facility has fewer employees than the Water and Sewer Line and Related Structu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · FL · Orlando

1,614 Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures Construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Santa Ana Creek Development dba Mark Company 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Williams Utility, LLC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Insituform Technologies LLC - Littleton 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR badger environmental & earthworks inc 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE GOPHER RIDGE GROVE 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE DESOTO GROVE 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oasis 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1247- HA- Live Oak, FL 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Southeast Health Group 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Target (WC USX TAL) 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Crozer Keystone Health System 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR McGill Asbestos Abatement, LLC 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE US Wick Drain 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE M & S Construction Inc 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Robstown Office 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newport Laboratories Diagnostics/R&D 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.