Natural Gas Distribution · Tennessee

200 Noah Dr Franklin Tn

Franklin, TN · ~35 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

200 Noah Dr Franklin Tn runs at 390% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Natural Gas Distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

200 Noah Dr Franklin Tn: 4.7 TCR = 390% of Natural Gas Distribution BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

200 Noah Dr Franklin Tn safety composite

200 Noah Dr Franklin Tn scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.1

2017→2024

200 Noah Dr Franklin Tn injury rate improved

200 Noah Dr Franklin Tn's TCR fell 9.1 from 11.3 in 2017 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=5.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=10.3 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221210 · Franklin, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.7 · 390% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #16/19
  • PHOTO Gas Construction Mid…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gas Construction Midland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

200 Noah Dr Franklin Tn in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 200 Noah Dr Franklin Tn averages 4.7 TCR (390% of the Natural Gas Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

200 Noah Dr Franklin Tn TCR series: 2017=11.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=5.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=10.3 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 1.2

Where 200 Noah Dr Franklin Tn falls in its industry

1,153 Natural Gas Distribution establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 19 Natural Gas Distribution employers in Tennessee.

200 Noah Dr Franklin Tn (35 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 200 Noah Dr Franklin Tn
200 Noah Dr Franklin Tn (35 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6

200 Noah Dr Franklin Tn has fewer employees than the Natural Gas Distribution median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2023 10.3 5.1 2 2 0
2022 5.6 5.6 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.4 5.4 2 0 0
2019 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 11.3 5.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221210 · TN · Franklin

1,153 Natural Gas Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 181 employers in Franklin, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gas Construction Midland 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alb Electrice Service Center 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pueblo Service Center-705 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR El Centro Base - Ross Ave - 15 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE TN 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE 810 CRESCENT CENTRE DR FRANKLIN TN 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Distribution and Business Office 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Chattanooga 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Williamson County Board of Education - Williamson County Schools 6,320 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nissan Americas Headquarters - Franklin 2,007 FTE
CITY-NEAR Williamson County Government 1,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lee Company 1,716 FTE
NAT-TCR Climate Control of Pensacola, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Vista 2 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cheverly Md 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 045 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Hallstar Beauty and Personal Care Company 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE 254 - Kings Student Transp Auth Ca 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ardent Mills Stockton 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE 294 - Emeryville Ca 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.