Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · New York

2010-Ucpmc-Sheehan Ira

Boonville, NY · ~27 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

2010-Ucpmc-Sheehan Ira runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade D.

2010-Ucpmc-Sheehan Ira: 6.4 TCR = 169% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

2010-Ucpmc-Sheehan Ira safety composite

2010-Ucpmc-Sheehan Ira scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

2010-Ucpmc-Sheehan Ira: 3.9 → 12.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 16.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.98× in 2023

2010-Ucpmc-Sheehan Ira's TCR rose 8.7 from 3.9 in 2016 to 12.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 16.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Boonville, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 169% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #157/336
  • PHOTO Admin BH Unit Admin/…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Admin BH Unit Admin/Support (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

2010-Ucpmc-Sheehan Ira in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 2010-Ucpmc-Sheehan Ira averages 6.4 TCR (169% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

2010-Ucpmc-Sheehan Ira TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=8 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=16.4 · 2023=12.6 · BLS 3.8

Where 2010-Ucpmc-Sheehan Ira falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #157 safest of 336 Group homes, intellectual and employers in New York.

2010-Ucpmc-Sheehan Ira (27 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 2010-Ucpmc-Sheehan Ira
2010-Ucpmc-Sheehan Ira (27 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

2010-Ucpmc-Sheehan Ira has fewer employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 12.6 6.3 2 0 0
2022 16.4 10.9 3 0 0
2021 0.3 0.0 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 8.0 8.0 2 0 0
2016 3.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · NY · Boonville

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 14 employers in Boonville, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Admin BH Unit Admin/Support 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garden Isle Healthcare, LLC 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 581502 024055_HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY DC_ICF 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7722-LOGAN FACILITY 1 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rick Minkus Farms 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highbanks Dairy 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Van Slyke's Dairy Farm LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Synergy LLC 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUNSET NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR BOONVILLE 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tops #598 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Hardwood Flooring 52 FTE
NAT-TCR Memorial Hermann Home Healthcare 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR AdventHealth Care Hospice Care Central 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1995 Apple Valley, CA 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5339 Waynesboro, VA 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE S E Hardesty Co 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chula Vista, Ca #00018 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE El Paso, Tx #00055 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE CARE - Elkin 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.