Supermarkets and Other Grocery Retailers except Convenience Retailers · California

20500002-786 Store 786 - Danville

Danville, CA · ~47 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

20500002-786 Store 786 - Danville runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Supermarkets and Other Grocery Retailers except Convenience Retailers workplace, earning a grade B.

20500002-786 Store 786 - Danville: 2.2 TCR = 65% of Supermarkets and Other Grocery Retailers except Convenience Retailers BLS 3.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

20500002-786 Store 786 - Danville safety composite

20500002-786 Store 786 - Danville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

20500002-786 Store 786 - Danville: 0.0 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

20500002-786 Store 786 - Danville's TCR rose 4.4 from 0.0 in 2023 to 4.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · Danville, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #323/4686
  • PHOTO Store 1642
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Store 1642 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

20500002-786 Store 786 - Danville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 20500002-786 Store 786 - Danville averages 2.2 TCR (65% of the Supermarkets and Other Grocery Retailers except Convenience Retailers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

20500002-786 Store 786 - Danville TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=4.4 · BLS 3.4

Where 20500002-786 Store 786 - Danville falls in its industry

30,654 Supermarkets and Other Grocery establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #323 safest of 4686 Supermarkets and Other Grocery employers in California.

20500002-786 Store 786 - Danville (47 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 20500002-786 Store 786 - Danville
20500002-786 Store 786 - Danville (47 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

20500002-786 Store 786 - Danville has fewer employees than the Supermarkets and Other Grocery Retailers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · CA · Danville

30,654 Supermarkets and Other Grocery Retailers except Convenience Retailers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 34 employers in Danville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Store 1642 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bashas 042 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR English Family Enterprises DBA Grocery Outlet of Santa Teresa 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AVERY FOOD CORPORATION dba BIG TREES MARKET 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Palihotel Hollywood 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boudin SF - Balboa Mesa 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Courte at Citrus Heights 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maudlin Drywall, Inc. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 124 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0021 - DANVILLE CA WHSE 393 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blackhawk Country Club 282 FTE
CITY-NEAR JERO Corp 220 FTE
NAT-TCR EZ Air Park 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 127 Richardson 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Turn-Key Solutions, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Reston 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Edmondson Farms Packing, Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Courtyard at Oshkosh 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE S&R Truck 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sfi Acquisition, D.B.a State Fabricators, Inc 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.