Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine · North Carolina

2073-Randolph Internal Medicine

Charlotte, NC · ~27 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

2073-Randolph Internal Medicine runs at 206% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine workplace, earning a grade F.

2073-Randolph Internal Medicine: 7.8 TCR = 206% of Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

2073-Randolph Internal Medicine safety composite

2073-Randolph Internal Medicine scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.4

2017→2018

2073-Randolph Internal Medicine injury rate improved

2073-Randolph Internal Medicine's TCR fell 7.4 from 11.5 in 2017 to 4.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.5 · 2018=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 206% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #135/152
  • PHOTO Community Health Cen…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Community Health Center of Snohomish County - Everett-North Clinic (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

2073-Randolph Internal Medicine in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 2073-Randolph Internal Medicine averages 7.8 TCR (206% of the Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

2073-Randolph Internal Medicine TCR series: 2017=11.5 · 2018=4.1 · BLS 3.8

Where 2073-Randolph Internal Medicine falls in its industry

2,836 Offices and Clinics of Doctors establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #135 safest of 152 Offices and Clinics of Doctors employers in North Carolina.

2073-Randolph Internal Medicine (27 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 2073-Randolph Internal Medicine
2073-Randolph Internal Medicine (27 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

2073-Randolph Internal Medicine has fewer employees than the Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medici median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 4.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 11.5 3.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · NC · Charlotte

2,836 Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Community Health Center of Snohomish County - Everett-North Clinic 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Gould Medical Foundation (195-101) 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3001 Expressway Drive North 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Virtua Lumberton - ABC 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bissette Farms, Inc 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyde County Pullet Farm 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyde County Pullet 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Price Logging Inc 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR KC Waterpark Management, LLC 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 33-CLEVELAND 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 050 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Schutt Reconditioning 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Molly Maid of Northern Brevard County 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE 210 Norton 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE 222 Dublin LOC 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Partners Metalfab 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.