Transportation Air Carriers · Colorado

2073-SW-20730034-CS

Grand Junction, CO · ~42 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

2073-SW-20730034-CS runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Transportation Air Carriers workplace, earning a grade D.

2073-SW-20730034-CS: 7.4 TCR = 165% of Transportation Air Carriers BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

2073-SW-20730034-CS safety composite

2073-SW-20730034-CS scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2022

2073-SW-20730034-CS injury rate improved

2073-SW-20730034-CS's TCR fell 1.4 from 7.2 in 2016 to 5.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.2 · 2017=16.0 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=5.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Grand Junction, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.4 · 165% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #32/57
  • PHOTO 4795-EA-BHM-BIRMINGH…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4795-EA-BHM-BIRMINGHAM-BHM-TRML (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

2073-SW-20730034-CS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 2073-SW-20730034-CS averages 7.4 TCR (165% of the Transportation Air Carriers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

2073-SW-20730034-CS TCR series: 2016=7.2 · 2017=16 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=5.9 · BLS 4.5

Where 2073-SW-20730034-CS falls in its industry

1,568 Transportation Air Carriers establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 57 Transportation Air Carriers employers in Colorado.

2073-SW-20730034-CS (42 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate 2073-SW-20730034-CS
2073-SW-20730034-CS (42 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

2073-SW-20730034-CS has fewer employees than the Transportation Air Carriers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.9 2.0 3 0 0
2021 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2020 7.7 5.1 3 0 0
2019 8.6 8.6 5 0 0
2018 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2017 16.0 8.0 4 0 0
2016 7.2 7.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · CO · Grand Junction

1,568 Transportation Air Carriers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 233 employers in Grand Junction, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4795-EA-BHM-BIRMINGHAM-BHM-TRML 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-EA-RDM-REDMOND-RDM-TRML 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-PD-PHX-PHOENIX-PHX-PDMT 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-EA-MEM-MEMPHIS-MEM-TRML 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE MiNDFUL - Holly 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE WLM Limon Wind Plant 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sangre de Cristo Association 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sangre de Cristo Electric Association 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital 2,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital and Medical Center 2,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital 1,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hilltop Health Services Corporation- 609 27 1/2 Road 641 FTE
NAT-TCR Rancho Del Oro Landscape 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 056624-Roseville Po 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 055664-Orange Po 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 210598-Bastrop Po 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1513 Family Fare -Kalkaska, MI FF, LLC #38-2750461 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1519 Family Fare - Oscoda, MI FF, LLC #38-2750461 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1523 Family Fare - Harrison, MI FF, LLC #38-2750461 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3077 Dillonvale Iga (Cincinnati, Oh) 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.