Transportation Air Carriers · California

2073-SW-20730069-CS

San Luis Obispo, CA · ~53 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

2073-SW-20730069-CS runs at 266% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Transportation Air Carriers workplace, earning a grade F.

2073-SW-20730069-CS: 12.0 TCR = 266% of Transportation Air Carriers BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

2073-SW-20730069-CS safety composite

2073-SW-20730069-CS scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−24.5

2016→2022

2073-SW-20730069-CS injury rate improved

2073-SW-20730069-CS's TCR fell 24.5 from 31.7 in 2016 to 7.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 31.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=31.7 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=13.5 · 2019=14.0 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=7.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · San Luis Obispo, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.0 · 266% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #135/177
  • PHOTO 4795-AA-SAN-SAN DIEG…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4795-AA-SAN-SAN DIEGO-SAN-TRML (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

2073-SW-20730069-CS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 2073-SW-20730069-CS averages 12.0 TCR (266% of the Transportation Air Carriers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

2073-SW-20730069-CS TCR series: 2016=31.7 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=13.5 · 2019=14 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=7.2 · BLS 4.5

Where 2073-SW-20730069-CS falls in its industry

1,568 Transportation Air Carriers establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #135 safest of 177 Transportation Air Carriers employers in California.

2073-SW-20730069-CS (53 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate 2073-SW-20730069-CS
2073-SW-20730069-CS (53 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

2073-SW-20730069-CS has fewer employees than the Transportation Air Carriers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.2 4.8 6 0 0
2021 7.5 7.5 4 0 0
2020 4.3 4.3 2 0 0
2019 14.0 10.5 8 0 0
2018 13.5 9.6 7 0 0
2017 5.7 2.9 2 0 0
2016 31.7 12.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · CA · San Luis Obispo

1,568 Transportation Air Carriers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 177 employers in San Luis Obispo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4795-AA-SAN-SAN DIEGO-SAN-TRML 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-EA-MAF-MIDLAND-ODESSA-EAGLE ACS 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TUL - Ground Ops 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-PD-CLT-CHARLOTTE-PD 12.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE P-R Farms 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE LRC LABOR SERVICES INC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acemi Nursery 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ball Tagawa Growers 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bella Vista Transitional Care Center 8,119 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Men's Colony - San Luis Obispo 1,599 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Men's Colony 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 279 946 FTE
NAT-TCR 567520-Sheboygan Falls Po 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 4186-DC2 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 118434-Sar-Southgate Sta 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-00185 12.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2073-SW-20730040-CS 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1904 FAMILY FARE, Lakeview FF, LLC #38-2750461 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1929 VGS - Genesee, MI FF, LLC #38-2750461 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3791 Family Fare (Valley View-Council Bluff, Ia) 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.