Other Direct Selling Establishments · Massachusetts

2077-Us Dd Nw Norton Branch

Norton, MA · ~64 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

2077-Us Dd Nw Norton Branch runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Other Direct Selling Establishments workplace, earning a grade D.

2077-Us Dd Nw Norton Branch: 5.1 TCR = 150% of Other Direct Selling Establishments BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

2077-Us Dd Nw Norton Branch safety composite

2077-Us Dd Nw Norton Branch scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2021

2077-Us Dd Nw Norton Branch injury rate improved

2077-Us Dd Nw Norton Branch's TCR fell 0.8 from 3.7 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.7 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 454390 · Norton, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 150% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO 2077-US DD NW PENNSA…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2077-US DD NW PENNSAUKEN BRANCH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

2077-Us Dd Nw Norton Branch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 2077-Us Dd Nw Norton Branch averages 5.1 TCR (150% of the Other Direct Selling Establishments BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

2077-Us Dd Nw Norton Branch TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=2.9 · BLS 3.4

Where 2077-Us Dd Nw Norton Branch falls in its industry

212 Other Direct Selling Establish establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Other Direct Selling Establish employers in Massachusetts.

2077-Us Dd Nw Norton Branch (64 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 2077-Us Dd Nw Norton Branch
2077-Us Dd Nw Norton Branch (64 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 4.1

2077-Us Dd Nw Norton Branch has more employees than the Other Direct Selling Establishments median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2020 4.1 2.8 3 0 0
2019 7.8 7.8 6 0 0
2018 5.8 4.7 5 0 0
2017 6.2 6.2 5 0 0
2016 3.7 3.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

454390 · MA · Norton

212 Other Direct Selling Establishments employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 33 employers in Norton, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2077-US DD NW PENNSAUKEN BRANCH 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2077-US DD NW JAMAICA BRANCH 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Culligan 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ST. JOHNS, MI 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE System 7 Wolfers, Inc.-Beverly Office 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE kleeberg Mechanical Services LLC 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE William F. Lynch Co., Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Industrial Transfer & Storage, Inc. 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horizon Beverage Company, Inc. 520 FTE
CITY-NEAR AI Distribution Center 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR New England Ice Cream Corporation 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR S09205 - Norton Hauling 181 FTE
NAT-TCR 4818-NYRC 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-6049-Williams Sonoma 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 49241d - Sacramento Bulk Sales 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MicroStar Quality Services - CO4 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE RSH Construction 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Scsu-Washington Hall-Res Din 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE WTPS - Ghent 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Ut-Austin - Training Table 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.