Mail and Parcel Delivery · Maryland

238480-Ssp-Aspen Hill Carrier Anx

Silver Spring, MD · ~82 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

238480-Ssp-Aspen Hill Carrier Anx runs at 141% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Mail and Parcel Delivery workplace, earning a grade D.

238480-Ssp-Aspen Hill Carrier Anx: 6.3 TCR = 141% of Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

238480-Ssp-Aspen Hill Carrier Anx safety composite

238480-Ssp-Aspen Hill Carrier Anx scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.7

2017→2022

238480-Ssp-Aspen Hill Carrier Anx injury rate improved

238480-Ssp-Aspen Hill Carrier Anx's TCR fell 9.7 from 10.9 in 2017 to 1.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.9 · 2018=9.9 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Silver Spring, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 141% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #92/304
  • PHOTO JACKSONVILLE_1368215
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JACKSONVILLE_1368215 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

238480-Ssp-Aspen Hill Carrier Anx in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 238480-Ssp-Aspen Hill Carrier Anx averages 6.3 TCR (141% of the Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

238480-Ssp-Aspen Hill Carrier Anx TCR series: 2017=10.9 · 2018=9.9 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.2 · BLS 4.5

Where 238480-Ssp-Aspen Hill Carrier Anx falls in its industry

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #92 safest of 304 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers in Maryland.

238480-Ssp-Aspen Hill Carrier Anx (82 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 238480-Ssp-Aspen Hill Carrier Anx
238480-Ssp-Aspen Hill Carrier Anx (82 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

238480-Ssp-Aspen Hill Carrier Anx has more employees than the Mail and Parcel Delivery median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2020 6.8 5.5 5 0 0
2019 8.1 4.0 5 1 0
2018 9.9 6.2 8 0 0
2017 10.9 10.9 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · MD · Silver Spring

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 160 employers in Silver Spring, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JACKSONVILLE_1368215 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MILLCREEK_1440048 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CARMEL_1357052 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR HUFFMAN_1367580 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE NTI, LLC 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Systems-Sparks 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Odenton 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frederick MD Millwork 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Hospital-Silver Spring 3,228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Hospital-Silver Spring-HCH-MD 2,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist HealthCare, Inc., d/b/a Adventist HealthCare White Oak Medical Center 1,496 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riderwood Village 1,375 FTE
NAT-TCR 174036-Indianapolis in Vmf 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 567510-Sheboygan Po 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 193377-Gardner Po 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Manor Care Health Services - Dunedin 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 418685-Upr-Havertown-U Darby 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE 415608-Morrisville Po 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE 512418-Danville Po 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE 361520-Clayton Po 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.