Mail and Parcel Delivery · Maryland

238483-Ssp-Takoma Park Carrier Anx

Silver Spring, MD · ~43 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

238483-Ssp-Takoma Park Carrier Anx runs at 269% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mail and Parcel Delivery workplace, earning a grade F.

238483-Ssp-Takoma Park Carrier Anx: 12.1 TCR = 269% of Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

238483-Ssp-Takoma Park Carrier Anx safety composite

238483-Ssp-Takoma Park Carrier Anx scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.1

2017→2022

238483-Ssp-Takoma Park Carrier Anx injury rate improved

238483-Ssp-Takoma Park Carrier Anx's TCR fell 12.1 from 20.0 in 2017 to 7.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 20.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=20.0 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=15.1 · 2021=12.7 · 2022=7.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Silver Spring, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.1 · 269% of ind

  • DART 7.9 DART
  • RANK #224/304
  • PHOTO RIVER OAKS_1379441
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RIVER OAKS_1379441 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

238483-Ssp-Takoma Park Carrier Anx in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 238483-Ssp-Takoma Park Carrier Anx averages 12.1 TCR (269% of the Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

238483-Ssp-Takoma Park Carrier Anx TCR series: 2017=20 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=15.1 · 2021=12.7 · 2022=7.9 · BLS 4.5

Where 238483-Ssp-Takoma Park Carrier Anx falls in its industry

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #224 safest of 304 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers in Maryland.

238483-Ssp-Takoma Park Carrier Anx (43 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 238483-Ssp-Takoma Park Carrier Anx
238483-Ssp-Takoma Park Carrier Anx (43 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

238483-Ssp-Takoma Park Carrier Anx has fewer employees than the Mail and Parcel Delivery median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.9 7.9 2 1 0
2021 12.7 7.6 3 2 0
2019 15.1 15.1 6 0 0
2018 4.9 2.5 2 0 0
2017 20.0 17.5 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · MD · Silver Spring

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 160 employers in Silver Spring, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RIVER OAKS_1379441 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR HOLLIS_1367210 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 096827-WLM-TALLEYVILLE BR 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 230430-BAL-WINDSOR MILL BR 12.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beltsville Warehouse 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE CBG 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Banneker Ventures 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Coast Building Services LLC 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Hospital-Silver Spring 3,228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Hospital-Silver Spring-HCH-MD 2,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist HealthCare, Inc., d/b/a Adventist HealthCare White Oak Medical Center 1,496 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riderwood Village 1,375 FTE
NAT-TCR 096827-Wlm-Talleyville Br 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hrc 753 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Neodesha Care and Rehab 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Willow Creek Retirement Center 12.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 518586-Sterling Po 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE 104955-Wdc-Brookland Sta 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE 418684-Upper Darby Po 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE 418208-Stroudsburg Po 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.