Mail and Parcel Delivery · Michigan

258237-Roy-Madison Hts Carrier Anx

Troy, MI · ~62 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

258237-Roy-Madison Hts Carrier Anx runs at 272% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mail and Parcel Delivery workplace, earning a grade F.

258237-Roy-Madison Hts Carrier Anx: 12.3 TCR = 272% of Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

258237-Roy-Madison Hts Carrier Anx safety composite

258237-Roy-Madison Hts Carrier Anx scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
C 3.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.8

2017→2022

258237-Roy-Madison Hts Carrier Anx injury rate improved

258237-Roy-Madison Hts Carrier Anx's TCR fell 16.8 from 22.0 in 2017 to 5.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 22.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=22.0 · 2018=15.4 · 2019=13.6 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=7.6 · 2022=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Troy, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.3 · 272% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #337/464
  • PHOTO SAINT BERNARD_1437049
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SAINT BERNARD_1437049 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

258237-Roy-Madison Hts Carrier Anx in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 258237-Roy-Madison Hts Carrier Anx averages 12.3 TCR (272% of the Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

258237-Roy-Madison Hts Carrier Anx TCR series: 2017=22 · 2018=15.4 · 2019=13.6 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=7.6 · 2022=5.2 · BLS 4.5

Where 258237-Roy-Madison Hts Carrier Anx falls in its industry

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #337 safest of 464 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers in Michigan.

258237-Roy-Madison Hts Carrier Anx (62 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 258237-Roy-Madison Hts Carrier Anx
258237-Roy-Madison Hts Carrier Anx (62 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

258237-Roy-Madison Hts Carrier Anx has more employees than the Mail and Parcel Delivery median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.2 3.9 2 2 0
2021 7.6 7.6 4 0 0
2020 9.8 9.8 5 0 0
2019 13.6 13.6 7 0 0
2018 15.4 13.5 7 1 0
2017 22.0 20.1 11 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · MI · Troy

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 237 employers in Troy, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SAINT BERNARD_1437049 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR HACKBERRY_1365907 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BEVERLY HILLS CARRIER ANNEX_1468917 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 253900-GRAND LEDGE PO 12.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Riveridge Land Company 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marshall 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ypsilanti Community Utilities Authority - Administration & Wastewater Operations 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lombardo Homes of St Louis 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2250-309 5,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Troy - Maple Road 1,702 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headquarters 1,607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Troy - Maple Road 1,361 FTE
NAT-TCR Villa at Lincoln Park 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of Cheshire, Connecticut 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunnyside Operations 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR MLC-NOC-SOC 12.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 170946-Brownsburg Po 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE 384620-Loveland Po 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE 180846-Bettendorf Po 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE 273796-Jck-Lefleur Sta 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.