Instrument Manufacturing for Measuring and Testing Electricity and Electrical Signals · California

2967-CA124

San Luis Obispo, CA · ~38 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

2967-CA124 runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Instrument Manufacturing for Measuring and Testing Electricity and Electrical Signals workplace, earning a grade A.

2967-CA124: 0.6 TCR = 19% of Instrument Manufacturing for Measuring and Testing Electricity and Electrical Signals BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

2967-CA124 safety composite

2967-CA124 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

2967-CA124 held a steady TCR band

2967-CA124's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334515 · San Luis Obispo, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/35
  • PHOTO Longhorn Automation …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Longhorn Automation & Electrical (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

2967-CA124 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 2967-CA124 averages 0.6 TCR (19% of the Instrument Manufacturing for Measuring and Testing Electricity and Electrical Signals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

2967-CA124 TCR series: 2017=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where 2967-CA124 falls in its industry

125 Instrument Manufacturing for M establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 35 Instrument Manufacturing for M employers in California.

2967-CA124 (38 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 2967-CA124
2967-CA124 (38 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9

2967-CA124 has fewer employees than the Instrument Manufacturing for Measuring a median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334515 · CA · San Luis Obispo

125 Instrument Manufacturing for Measuring and Testing Electricity and Electrical Signals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 177 employers in San Luis Obispo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Longhorn Automation & Electrical 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keysight Technologies, Englewood 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Derive Systems, LLC. Headquarters 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fluke Electronics- Fluke Park 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O SHIPPING 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAR & S Farm Labor Services, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Almonds of California, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bays Ranch Inc 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bella Vista Transitional Care Center 8,119 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Men's Colony - San Luis Obispo 1,599 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Men's Colony 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 279 946 FTE
NAT-TCR 3495-11DP001 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 642 Family Fare - Traverse City, MI PREVO'S #38-3345860 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NM006 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CO012 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2967-MN108 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2967-RI95 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3495-10D8961 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3495-10D8322 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.