General warehousing and storage · Pennsylvania

30376 - Capstone Giant Eagle Pittsburgh Pa

Pittsburgh, PA · ~33 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

30376 - Capstone Giant Eagle Pittsburgh Pa runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

30376 - Capstone Giant Eagle Pittsburgh Pa: 1.9 TCR = 33% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

30376 - Capstone Giant Eagle Pittsburgh Pa safety composite

30376 - Capstone Giant Eagle Pittsburgh Pa scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2017

30376 - Capstone Giant Eagle Pittsburgh Pa injury rate improved

30376 - Capstone Giant Eagle Pittsburgh Pa's TCR fell 3.8 from 3.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.8 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #154/650
  • PHOTO NA-US-CA-Livermore-2…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NA-US-CA-Livermore-201-Discovery-Dr-Warehouse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

30376 - Capstone Giant Eagle Pittsburgh Pa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 30376 - Capstone Giant Eagle Pittsburgh Pa averages 1.9 TCR (33% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

30376 - Capstone Giant Eagle Pittsburgh Pa TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=0 · BLS 5.8

Where 30376 - Capstone Giant Eagle Pittsburgh Pa falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #154 safest of 650 General warehousing and storag employers in Pennsylvania.

30376 - Capstone Giant Eagle Pittsburgh Pa (33 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 30376 - Capstone Giant Eagle Pittsburgh Pa
30376 - Capstone Giant Eagle Pittsburgh Pa (33 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

30376 - Capstone Giant Eagle Pittsburgh Pa has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.8 3.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · PA · Pittsburgh

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NA-US-CA-Livermore-201-Discovery-Dr-Warehouse 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR FTDI-West, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advance Auto Parts DC 16 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PGS Port Wentworth 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE CSRU 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE WAWA SITE - 216 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE WAWA SITE - 185 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bleyer Gift Packs LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Autumn Care of Mocskville 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Derrick - Houston 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Johnson Electric - Vandalia 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Impresa Aerospace 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE HMA Contracting Corp. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peterson Home Health Care Services 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE GCT - Plainfield 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE GCT - Dayton 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.