Bonded warehousing, general merchandise · Nebraska

30644 - Capstone Frito Lay La Vista NE

Omaha, NE · ~38 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

30644 - Capstone Frito Lay La Vista NE runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bonded warehousing, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

30644 - Capstone Frito Lay La Vista NE: 1.8 TCR = 31% of Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

30644 - Capstone Frito Lay La Vista NE safety composite

30644 - Capstone Frito Lay La Vista NE scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2021→2024

30644 - Capstone Frito Lay La Vista NE injury rate improved

30644 - Capstone Frito Lay La Vista NE's TCR fell 4.7 from 4.7 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.7 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Omaha, NE AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/49
  • PHOTO 050W LCI
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 050W LCI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

30644 - Capstone Frito Lay La Vista NE in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 30644 - Capstone Frito Lay La Vista NE averages 1.8 TCR (31% of the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

30644 - Capstone Frito Lay La Vista NE TCR series: 2021=4.7 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where 30644 - Capstone Frito Lay La Vista NE falls in its industry

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general me establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 49 Bonded warehousing, general me employers in Nebraska.

30644 - Capstone Frito Lay La Vista NE (38 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 30644 - Capstone Frito Lay La Vista NE
30644 - Capstone Frito Lay La Vista NE (38 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

30644 - Capstone Frito Lay La Vista NE has fewer employees than the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2021 4.7 4.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NE · Omaha

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 050W LCI 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - BLV2 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (UCG-6458) 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zebra Alliance. (SMRU12534) 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE R Lazy K Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE BHE - Papillion W 6th St (NE010) 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Energy Center Omaha 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Darland Construction 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers 9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nebraska Medicine 8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL 2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR Hormel Food 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Location 1 / UC 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Logos Public Charter School 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlantic Track Runway Services 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE ISSC INC DBA SEAPORT STEEL - Vancouver 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE RCN Telecom Services MA, LLC- Canton 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE ICB 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Camillus Ridge Terrace 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.