Mail and Parcel Delivery · New Jersey

338325-Sussex Po

Name: 338325-Sussex Po Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Sussex, NJ · ~29 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 8.6
Avg TCR: 4.5
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

338325-Sussex Po runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Mail and Parcel Delivery workplace, earning a grade D.

338325-Sussex Po: 8.6 TCR = 192% of Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

338325-Sussex Po safety composite

338325-Sussex Po scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 8.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers
DART rate: C 3.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.3

2018→2022

338325-Sussex Po injury rate improved

338325-Sussex Po's TCR fell 7.3 from 11.2 in 2018 to 3.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.2 · 2019=13.3 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Sussex, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.6 · 192% of ind

DART 3.9 DART
RANK #301/464
PHOTO RED BANK_1378933
BOOK 5y book
INJ 10 inj
SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RED BANK_1378933 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

This site

8.6
RED BANK_13789

8.6
CANOGA PARK_13

8.6
VILLAGE_143570

8.6
SENECA_1381212

8.6

What this shows 338325-Sussex Po averages 8.6 TCR (192% of the Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS benchmark).

338325-Sussex Po TCR series: 2018=11.2 · 2019=13.3 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=3.9 · BLS 4.5

Where 338325-Sussex Po falls in its industry

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #301 safest of 464 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers in New Jersey.

338325-Sussex Po (29 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

338325-Sussex Po has fewer employees than the Mail and Parcel Delivery median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2022	3.9	3.9	0	1
2021	7.7	7.7	2	0
2020	7.1	7.1	2	0
2019	13.3	13.3	3	0
2018	11.2	11.2	3	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · NJ · Sussex

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 13 employers in Sussex, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	RED BANK_1378933	RED BANK, NJ	8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	CANOGA PARK_1356877	CANOGA PARK, CA	8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	VILLAGE_1435702	OKLAHOMA CITY, OK	8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	SENECA_1381212	SENECA, SC	8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE	PRP Services Inc	BRICK	29 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Allied Construction Group Inc	PARLIN	29 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Renda Roads, Inc.	BRANCHBURG	29 FTE
STATE-SIZE	CMAC Communications Inc	BARNEGAT	29 FTE
CITY-NEAR	SHOPRITE OF SUSSEX	Sussex	291 FTE
CITY-NEAR	5472-000001787	Sussex	111 FTE
CITY-NEAR	5472-NAI-0034-0034-01787	Sussex	99 FTE
CITY-NEAR	NAI-0034-0034-01787 FAC-01787-SUSSEX-NJ	Sussex	94 FTE
NAT-TCR	1855-OKTUL02	Broken Arrow, OK	8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	233258-Forest Hill Po	Forest Hill, MD	8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	510307-Arl-Buckingham Sta	Arlington, VA	8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	6400-SWY-0027-0027-03540	Des Moines, WA	8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE	084720-Nhv-Mt Carmel-Hamden Br	Hamden, CT	29 FTE
NAT-SIZE	084713-Nhv-Amity Sta	New Haven, CT	29 FTE
NAT-SIZE	081700-Danielson Po	Danielson, CT	29 FTE
NAT-SIZE	080520-Bradley Amf	Windsor Locks, CT	29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.