Printing machinery for textiles manufacturing · Tennessee

3D Systems - Lawrenceburg

Lawrenceburg, TN · ~85 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

3D Systems - Lawrenceburg runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Printing machinery for textiles manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

3D Systems - Lawrenceburg: 0.9 TCR = 28% of Printing machinery for textiles manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

3D Systems - Lawrenceburg safety composite

3D Systems - Lawrenceburg scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2021

3D Systems - Lawrenceburg injury rate improved

3D Systems - Lawrenceburg's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.8 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333249 · Lawrenceburg, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/14
  • PHOTO Filtration : Carson
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Filtration : Carson (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

3D Systems - Lawrenceburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 3D Systems - Lawrenceburg averages 0.9 TCR (28% of the Printing machinery for textiles manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

3D Systems - Lawrenceburg TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where 3D Systems - Lawrenceburg falls in its industry

448 Printing machinery for textile establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 14 Printing machinery for textile employers in Tennessee.

3D Systems - Lawrenceburg (85 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 3D Systems - Lawrenceburg
3D Systems - Lawrenceburg (85 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0

3D Systems - Lawrenceburg has more employees than the Printing machinery for textiles manufact median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.4 0.0 0 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 1.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333249 · TN · Lawrenceburg

448 Printing machinery for textiles manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 53 employers in Lawrenceburg, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Filtration : Carson 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plano 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Filtration : Mineral Wells 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gribetz Manufacturing 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harriman Utility Board 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cleveland Utilities - Water/Wastewater Division 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Parkes Companies 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE 104561 - TVA Allen ALF Ash Pond Closure Project 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Modine Manufacturing Company - Lawrenceburg 626 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edwards Oil Company Inc. 604 FTE
CITY-NEAR Modine Manufacturing Company - Lawrenceburg 2 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cabinets To Go 496 FTE
NAT-TCR Klemm Tank Lines 53016 Rockford 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cypress Semiconductor Austin 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Central WA FAMILY MEDICINE 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Olam Cotton Silver Creek Gin 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Home Health Care - Southfield 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Strack and Van Til East Chicago 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hunter Douglas Ceiling & Wall Products 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walbridge 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.