Printing machinery for textiles manufacturing · Colorado

3D Systems - Littleton

Littleton, CO · ~254 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

3D Systems - Littleton runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Printing machinery for textiles manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

3D Systems - Littleton: 1.4 TCR = 44% of Printing machinery for textiles manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

3D Systems - Littleton safety composite

3D Systems - Littleton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

3D Systems - Littleton: 0.7 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.14× in 2024

3D Systems - Littleton's TCR rose 1.9 from 0.7 in 2018 to 2.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333249 · Littleton, CO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 44% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Profire Energy, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~254 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Profire Energy, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

3D Systems - Littleton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 3D Systems - Littleton averages 1.4 TCR (44% of the Printing machinery for textiles manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

3D Systems - Littleton TCR series: 2018=0.7 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=2 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=1 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where 3D Systems - Littleton falls in its industry

448 Printing machinery for textile establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Printing machinery for textile employers in Colorado.

3D Systems - Littleton (254 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 3D Systems - Littleton
3D Systems - Littleton (254 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0

3D Systems - Littleton has more employees than the Printing machinery for textiles manufact median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 1.6 8 0 0
2023 1.0 0.3 3 0 0
2022 2.1 0.0 6 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 5 0 0
2020 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.1 0.6 2 0 0
2018 0.7 0.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333249 · CO · Littleton

448 Printing machinery for textiles manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 238 employers in Littleton, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Profire Energy, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pettibone : Steelastic 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rain Bird Corp Southpoint 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Simpson Technologies Corporation 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Goodrich Corporation (Pueblo CO) 254 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1501 - Colorado Springs East 254 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delta Air Lines - DEN 254 FTE
STATE-SIZE Broadway 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Waterton Campus (1004) 5,542 FTE
CITY-NEAR Littleton Adventist Hospital 1,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US CO Littleton Deer Crk Cnyn (1003) 1,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Littleton 1,174 FTE
NAT-TCR United Team Mechanical. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR HOC Pleasant Grove 2 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Physicians East, P.A.- Corporate 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Klumb Lumber - Covington 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Screen Engine/ASI LLC 254 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jl Gray Construction, Inc. 254 FTE
NAT-SIZE Integra LifeSciences - Mansfield 254 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dallas Symphony Association Inc 254 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.